“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
I believe this is the reason the judge kept asking questions. He was trying to find a way that they either had standing or that they had judiciary (sp?) rights. I do believe he now needs time to try to figure out how he can legally move forward without getting himself in trouble.
He really seems like he wants to go forward with discovery! This whole mess he realizes could be settled by the show of a piece of paper. I’m sure he wonders why it isn’t being done and that there is corruption going on here.
I pray he sees the light and a way to prove standing or what ever juciciary? is necessary to result in discovery!
[decision would be continued to a later date]
Yeah yeah, we know, next MONDAY.
I don’t know if it means anything, but I do find it curious that the judge told both parties that they had the right to appeal any decision. Why would the judge do that if he was just going to dismiss on “lack of standing”? If the people didn’t have standing to bring the original suit then wouldn’t they lack any standing to appeal it as well (at least from the judge’s perspective)?
Continued. Legalese for “don’t call us, we’ll call you.”
I hope the judge doesn’t wimp out. We, the people all have standing to know if our ELECTED leader is qualified. Look what Obama has wrought already.
Obama should produce his records.