Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: luckybogey

“The distortions of the frames showed that they broke during a forward motion with a slight twisting component towards the left.”

consistent with an aircraft in a counter-clockwise (to port) spin/ flat spin. (your article also mentions a port stall/spin/turn)

I still GUESS the aircraft had departed controlled flight and THEN the VS broke off.

this airframe went WAY past Vne.

AND ... Boeing VS’ do not historically break off.


11 posted on 10/05/2009 11:22:16 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Blueflag
I still GUESS the aircraft had departed controlled flight and THEN the VS broke off.

So -- the airplane continued on for miles while in a flat spin?

How about --- the wind blew the tail off, it flew for a while and then entered a flat spin.

The problem with that is that because of the swept wing design, it would roll over as soon as a yaw motion started because the wind blew the vertical fin off.

The spinning would cause parts such as engines, to depart the airplane in various directions resulting in the dispersed pattern shown in the diagram.

The pattern is very similar to the A320 that crashed after departing New York, where the intact vertical fin was located away from the other parts.

12 posted on 10/05/2009 11:55:44 AM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson