To: fortunecookie
If I understand correctly, that shot of them was taken before Chicago was rejected on the first ballot. So it's not even reaction to losing, it's just their usual bitter expressions. And these are the faces which were supposed to have charmed the IOC, LOLOLOL
42 posted on
10/03/2009 4:03:16 PM PDT by
mrsmel
(Put the Gitmo terrorists near Capitol Hill.)
To: mrsmel
If I understand correctly, that shot of them was taken before Chicago was rejected on the first ballot. So it's not even reaction to losing, it's just their usual bitter expressions. And these are the faces which were supposed to have charmed the IOC, LOLOLOLOh, LOL, ROFL, that's the oozing charm that's supposed to sway the IOC? Gee, I'm shocked it didn't work. Yeah, shocked. ;-) Sigh, she must be realizing they have led a semi-charmed kind of life, this whole going at it the hard way is a lot of work!
I still can't figure how he justifies going in person when his health bill is struggling, our economy is still in great need, the Afghanistan situation is getting more dire, and all this at taxpayer expense? One would think that Michelle and Oprah alone could ably act as Chicago's ambassadors.
50 posted on
10/03/2009 5:34:59 PM PDT by
fortunecookie
(Please pray for Anna, age 7, who waits for a new kidney.)
To: mrsmel; fortunecookie
Yeah, check this shot out...taken during the D-Day ceremonies while Ms. Bruni was looking up at a flyby.
![](http://sfcmac.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/michelle-obama-glares-at-carla-bruni.jpg?w=399&h=261)
What the heck did the First Lady of France do to deserve that look? And if Bruni was the one shooting that hateful look, wouldn't every lib in the country say it must be driven by racism?
59 posted on
10/03/2009 8:57:20 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson