[Fred Nerks]

FYI from Leo’s blog comments:

loucon Says:

October 2, 2009 at 2:31 pm
This seems to be in conflict.

From: Okubo, Janice S.
To: [KingsKid - real name redacted]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 8:29 PM
Subject: RE: Clarificatio, Please
Aloha..,
I am sorry; I may have misunderstood your request. The “bride” and “groom” index data is from Stanley Ann Dunahm and Barack Hussein Obama index files.
The Department of Health does not hold divorce records, they are with the Department of Judiciary.

On the website: http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/index.html
Vital records (birth, death, marriage, and divorce certificates) for events that occurred in Hawaii are received and preserved by the Office of Health Status Monitoring, a unit of the Department of Health. In Hawaii, access to vital records is restricted by statute (HRS §338-18).

dictum ac factum.
loucon

[ed. what the hell? geez. this is just too weird. we’re looking into it. thanks for pointing that one out.]

---

There’s no ends they will not go to, to cover for zero.

[Electric Graffiti]

The “bride” and “groom” index data is from Stanley Ann Dunahm and Barack Hussein Obama index files.

Thanks for that update. More smoke screens from the DOH.

[STARWISE]

From Donofrio’s site:

~~~~~~~~~~

Melinda Says:
October 2, 2009 at 1:10 pm

Is he really this brazen, daring folks to challenge him ? This
was prepared text.

At the Olympic presentation, he said … “including my father
from the African continent.”

Scroll to the 1:13 mark

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r84lkFwXenc

That’s some hubris.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/terrik-investigation-part-3-hawaii-ag-mark-bennett-approved-fukinos-natural-born-citizen-statement-all-records-should-be-made-public-according-to-law/#comment-12968

[BP2]

Vital records (birth, death, marriage, and divorce certificates) for events that occurred in Hawaii are received and preserved by the Office of Health Status Monitoring, a unit of the Department of Health. In Hawaii, access to vital records is restricted by statute (HRS §338-18).

Yeah, I've been looking at that, too ;)

Either the DOH just broke the law, or they gave us a big bread crumb.

I'm also looking real hard at this part of the statute, keeping in mind TerryK’s email about Obama’s COLB being “AMENDED”:

§338-6 Local agent to prepare birth certificate. (a) If neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as provided in section 338-5 is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local agent of the department of health shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.

(b) The department shall prescribe the time within which a supplementary report furnishing information omitted on the original certificate may be returned for the purpose of completing the certificate. Certificates of birth completed by a supplementary report shall not be considered as “delayed” or “altered.” [L 1949, c 327, §10; RL 1955, §57-9; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-6]

Remember the "Date Accepted by State Register" vs "Date Filed by [Local] Registrar" issue?