[dinodino]

Good lord, doesn’t this crazy woman have anybody to proofread her documents?

[prplhze2000]

Don’t say anything, you are ruining their Black Panther party.

[CodeToad]

“Good lord, doesn’t this crazy woman have anybody to proofread her documents?”

How about you, or do you just like to bitch?

[browardchad]

She claiming that Judge Land -- before whom she has 8 days remaining to explain why she shouldn't pay $10,000 in sanctions for filing frivolous motions in which she called the judge a traitor, among other things -- granted her standing when he threw out the Rhodes case, and that imaginary standing now applies to the Keyes v. Obama case.

I used to think this woman was insane. Now I believe it's more a case that the law means nothing to her. She's using the courts as a staging platform to draw media attention to herself, and she doesn't give two figs about the "glorious cause" of "removing the usurper," or her clients -- she thrives on attention, even when it's overwhelmingly negative, so the more outrageous her behavior, the more attention. Rinse and repeat.

Narcissist Orly v Narcissist Obama, and it's not hard to figure out who will prevail, when he finally decides she's no longer useful as a figurehead useful in painting the entire right as nutjobs.