Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

That post of yours is the most outrageous, irrational analysis I have ever read. You have got to kidding? You are trying to justify the unauthorized expenditure of Federal funds to defend a President who is acting outside the scope of his employment (ineligible). It is those officials who are conducting this unauthorized defense that need to be taken to task for violating their duty to protect the U.S. Consitution, not Obama. Eventually, they will be brought to task for their unauthorized expenditures of our money. What an absoulte joke you are. Do you really believe that the intelligent, insightful Free Republic members who read and participate in this site are going to find your rubish convincing? Save your breath. Your not going to make any headway on this site.


32 posted on 09/25/2009 1:34:37 PM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: iontheball

Who you talking about, willis?


33 posted on 09/25/2009 1:38:09 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: iontheball

“Your not going to make any headway on this site.”

Neither are you if you don’t learn how to read an article heading, including the name of the author newbie.


35 posted on 09/25/2009 1:48:49 PM PDT by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: iontheball; pissant
Keep your i on the ball we are playing with.

Pissant posted the article. He did not write it. Posting does not mean a FReeper agrees (or even disagrees) with an author's views. He has, in FReeper fashion, thrown open the article for discussion by posting it to show the views of the author.

Pissant's opening comment directly addresses the issue, i.e., that in his opinion, the "Birthers" are not the primary or root cause of the expense, rather it is the intransigence of Team Obama in this matter.

Why the anger with the FReeper? Analysis of your post shows you agree with him, and disagree with the article's author.

36 posted on 09/25/2009 2:16:50 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Congratulations Obama Voters! You are not prejudiced. Unpatriotic, maybe. Dumb definitely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: iontheball; pissant

I fully agree with everything in your post beginning and ending with your first line:

“That post of yours is the most outrageous, irrational analysis I have ever read.”


41 posted on 09/25/2009 2:46:24 PM PDT by Sparko ("Barack Hussein Obama He said Red, Yellow, Black or White All are equal in His sight. Mmm, mmm, mmm")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: iontheball

way to step all over your own dick noob. pissant did NOT write this. it was not ‘his’ rubbish. good God.


45 posted on 09/25/2009 3:58:29 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: iontheball

“Your not going to make any headway on this site”

You’re not going to make any headway in this site without learning at least a little about the site.

“You have got to kidding?”

Before you post, preview. Your credibility suffers with posts like this.


50 posted on 09/25/2009 7:42:47 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (A mob of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson