1 posted on
09/22/2009 10:37:50 AM PDT by
pabianice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: pabianice
‘Zero” pushing for a revolution period!
2 posted on
09/22/2009 10:39:14 AM PDT by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: pabianice
a bunch of huge choppers just passed over my moms house in se ok.....
3 posted on
09/22/2009 10:39:14 AM PDT by
dalebert
To: pabianice
Is his name really spelled “McChrystal” and not “McCrystal”?
4 posted on
09/22/2009 10:40:53 AM PDT by
Mamzelle
(Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
To: pabianice
5 posted on
09/22/2009 10:42:35 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: pabianice
Judge Carter is/was a Marine who was seriously wounded in Vietnam.
6 posted on
09/22/2009 10:42:53 AM PDT by
Frantzie
(Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
To: Travis McGee
8 posted on
09/22/2009 10:46:24 AM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: pabianice
¶2:
A few days later, Johnson announced that the aviation assets of the US Marine Corps would be transferred to the Air Force, a plan quickly dropped after Congress had a fit at the news.First thought was that couldn't be LBJ. Search shows that is Louis A Johnson, SecDef under Truman.
9 posted on
09/22/2009 10:46:52 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("The President has borrowed more money to spend to less effect than anybody on the planet. " Steyn)
To: pabianice
Recently-ordained folk hero Harry Truman got royally bitch-slapped. You bees next, 0bama.....
10 posted on
09/22/2009 10:47:04 AM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Love my country. Hate my government./Barack Obama: An authentic "African American.")
To: pabianice
The Fringe Media may still be supporting Obama, but the CIA and the military are taking a very close look at their CIC...and the Generals are obviously are shocked by what they are learning.
I would suspect that there may be much more to this matter with McChrystal than what appears in the news.
14 posted on
09/22/2009 10:54:19 AM PDT by
SonOfDarkSkies
(For good judgment ask...What would Obama do? Then do the opposite!)
To: pabianice
In terms of the overall security of the country, 0bama's push for "a nuclear weapon free world" is what ought to truly trigger an "Admiral's Revolt".
The demise of F-22 production, which could have continued for the same $2 billion that the Feds borrowed to extend the "Cash for Clunkers" program is another example of the stupidity of the 0bama administration.
To: pabianice
More bombs less bullets is the solution for rubblestan. It makes no sense to build a stable ISLAMIC country. We already have Saudi Arabia and they are the ones espousing Wahhabi nutjobs, and keep gasoline prices high.
Its not the mountains or the opium or the tribes...its the Religion of islam
Kill islam first.
17 posted on
09/22/2009 10:59:27 AM PDT by
TomasUSMC
( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
To: pabianice
That hed betray our military and the country as part of a plan to transform the country is dawning on a lot of people who thought otherwise. "Transform" being Democommiespeak for "destroy".
18 posted on
09/22/2009 10:59:55 AM PDT by
workerbee
(If you vote for Democrats, you are engaging in UnAmerican Activity.)
To: pabianice
I think this is exactly what obozo wants. Get rid of the flag officers to replace them with dupes, minions and cronies. Flag officers are a threat to him. In spite of having clawed their way to the top of the heap by skill, qualification, endurance and stepping through a political minefield ...most do have some greater measure of Character, Principal, Ethics and alliegance ot the Constitution than obozo can tolerate.
All part of the obozo takeover plan as far as I am concerned. Weaken and disgust the military so they are demoralized, leaderless, disgusted and no longer a threat to anyone.
20 posted on
09/22/2009 11:10:59 AM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(Half of the population is below average)
To: pabianice
Our military people is NOT in the blind of the usurper’s treason, PTL!!!
21 posted on
09/22/2009 11:11:13 AM PDT by
danamco
To: pabianice
And didnt Forrestal die under very mysterious circumstances? Its ironic that they named the new class of carriers after him.
To: pabianice
Thank you for posting this.
Very educational! Why I like FR! :)
27 posted on
09/22/2009 11:30:16 AM PDT by
TSgt
(I long for Norman Rockwell's America.)
To: pabianice
I had to share this hysterical post at the bottom of this article:
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/22/2076663.aspx
So, let me get this straight: the plan for the war that Obama implemented is not working, the situation on the ground is getting worse, the general he put in charge is recommending a change in course,and obamawants to keep the plan but do LESS of it? I was afraid that Obamawould be Jimmy Carter part 2, but I was wrong. Jimmy Carter had a modicum of common sense, despite having seen aliens in 1969, and his well documented fear of killer rabbits. Obama just has an ego. Which must be fed, frequently.
29 posted on
09/22/2009 11:39:41 AM PDT by
TSgt
(I long for Norman Rockwell's America.)
To: pabianice
I just don't see any parallels here.
The revolt of the admirals was over roles and missions (in which the USAF tried to displace traditional funding for some elements of national strategy away from the Navy). For those who have never worked in the pentagon, such inter-service squabbling takes place all the time, on a smaller scale, admittedly, with the USAF as the usual interloper attempting to take funding from the army and navy.
The debate taking place now is more serious; lives of soldiers already deployed in a war zone are at stake and the occupant of the white house seems indifferent to their well being.
I can't think of a single instance in U.S. military history where the president (so called in this case, because in my mind, his legitimacy is still questionable) has shown such cavalier disregard for the lives of soldiers in a war zone.
30 posted on
09/22/2009 11:56:29 AM PDT by
OldCorps
To: pabianice
I have mixed feelings about the military and politics. I have always believed that the military should be nonpolitical, but it has taken me a long time to realize that the military has been political for decades. Maybe the private in the foxhole is not political, but the top brass is all about politics. These commanders are political appointees and their positions of power are not based upon military merit. It's all about whose political butt you are willing to kiss. If these generals and admirals were primarily concerned for those under them, they would all resign as a protest against Obama’s policies. I can't imagine how anyone could knowingly send men and women in harms way for a lost cause.
To: pabianice
39 posted on
09/22/2009 5:02:38 PM PDT by
gunnyg
(SUFFER NO FOOLS -Gunny G)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson