You are absolutely correct, sir, EVRYTHING about the Obama history is speculation. When a man will post a clear fraud on the Iinternet as his proof of bonefides, then alter that fraud by adding a raised seal, then post a completely other exhibit and claim that is genuine, what credulity should anything the lying bastard says have? Yet more than one judge has claimed the twittered or net images prove the liar’s lies. Go figure ...
Not only judges...but most in Congress and the SRM (State Run Media) have relied upon the fraudulent doc as their "proof," even holding a copy up for all to see on their T.V.'s.