Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

But she only claimed to have his “vital records”.


102 posted on 09/21/2009 6:58:15 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

Not her first statement. She claimed to have the original birth certificate, but gave no indication as what it said or if it matched the COLB. NADA


103 posted on 09/21/2009 6:59:26 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip
But she only claimed to have his “vital records”.

IN the second statement she made in July 09, but the one she made in October 08, said she'd seen his "original birth certificate". But in that context, the latest "amended" one is considered the original. Original doesn't mean "first" it means "the real document" not a copy or abstract. He could get a copy of that one, but it would take a court order to unseal an earlier one.

184 posted on 09/21/2009 10:10:44 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson