Posted on 09/19/2009 9:56:00 PM PDT by pissant
I find it very telling that when things are now starting to get “hot”, so many supposed conservatives (after all, they’re registered members of the most conservative website), find it enjoyable and fun - so many have said so themselves - to badger, snipe, hector and criticize anyone who is attempting to find the truth about 0bama.
Funny, that’s exactly what 0bama and his team want - the truth of his eligibility to be silenced and hidden, just like these FR members! Hmm, they want the exact same thing! Isn’t that remarkable!
All the time they spend crapping on these threads they could be “fighting his policies”, as they keep advising others...
Yes LJ, many these guys have a hidden agenda doing what they can spewing aspersions, BS and obfuscation. The hidden agenda is to protect Obama.
Not so hidden now. Things are heating up, more people are becoming aware of his - anomalies - and starting to wonder what the heck is going on.
Therefore, those trying to throw crap on these threads are becoming obvious for what they are really trying to do.
Instead, they say you're making us look bad or your helping Obama.
Both assertions are idiotic.
Yes, their phony assertions are looking more and more transparent day by day and hour by hour.
I doubt the magpies here are FR conservatives. 2 are known trolls. If ORly gets kreep kicked off the case then I will wonder if she is a plant.
The field is wide open for other attorneys to file cases.
I think the theory of sanctions allowing discovery and Leo’s work on the swearing in should lead to a dozen more lawsuits if we have any attorneys out there looking to fight.
This whole thing with Judge Land is interesting. Maybe judges have found a way to fight back against the corrupt judicary protecting Hussein by fining plaintiffs.
Land going ballistic on Orly was “odd.” No one can argue he punished Orly and threw her out of the court but......hmmm??
Some of the posters may have been here for years and they are moles for O.
And there’s the latest from some clown.
He says, you’re exciting sedition and desertion among the troops!!!!
Then I tell the clown introducing civil suits is hardly what you say. It’s a very civil manner for redress of the unanswered question that Obama and this government refuses to answer.
They are clowns.
Yes, If I was the lying and provocative leftists, I would sprinkle more that a few FR login IDs every year to troll the threads on issues that are critical or would hurt our cause...among the more active moles.
and it was mildly entertaining to boot.
***I suppose I have to admit this is true, this time. I used to get pretty frustrated with CoLB trolls, but now it’s like watching a Chihuahua irritate a Labrador — eventually it’s gonna be painful for the little trolldog.
Looks like the trolls went into a huddle and tried the tag-team tactic. Isn’t that cute?
Some of the posters may have been here for years and they are moles for O.
***I doubt that. They are truly annoying, and they are trolls, but they aren’t on zer0bama’s side. They just disagree with us. Their problem is they can’t just let us work our side of the street and they work theirs. It makes them into issue-specific trolls. In this case, the issue is the BC, so they are CoLB trolls. But at least the mods are getting tired of these trolls, slowly — look what happened to Star Traveler.
COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a ...Jan 16, 2009 ... (Trolling 101) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2165967/posts
I don’t know if Orly has thought about this angle yet, But I just forwarded it on to her.
They have to check with headquarters, or their upline, to find out what the next talking points are.
It's not bizarre at all. In 2000 the leftists claimed the travesty was that Bush stole the election. Now you claim, "...the Democrat Party wittingly nominated someone who does not meet the Constitutional eligibility requirements."
Both are equally groundless claims.
Nonsense. My claim is not groundless. It has been documented beyond any claim of innocent ignorance - except, apparently by you.
By Obama's OWN admission, he was not a Natural born Citizen at birth. The status of Natural Born Citizenship is obtained at birth, and cannot be obtained later in life. If he was not a Natural Born Citizen at birth, he cannot be one now. Thus is is proven that he is not Constitutionally qualified to the office he ostensibly holds, nor was he qualified when he ran.
Moreover, the Democratic National Committee was cognizant of that fact and wittingly, knowingly, omitted to include a sworn statement to the effect of his eligibility to serve in their certifications sent to the several states to secure his place on the ballot. Despite the fact that they had prepared precisely such documentation swearing to his eligibility, in fact they used almost identical certificates, differing only in that they failed to certify eligibility. Thus the second part of my assertion is demonstrated.
What is groundless here is your self-belief in your own analytic abilities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.