Posted on 09/17/2009 3:20:37 PM PDT by NaturalBornConservative
A Cooperative is a business organization owned and operated by a group of individuals for their mutual benefit. A cooperative may also be defined as a business owned and controlled equally by the people who use its services or who work at it.
There are many types of Co-Ops in the United States. I will attempt to address some of the most common cooperatives. If you belong to a credit union, you are already a member of a Co-Op. My electric and natural gas utility company is an EMC, another word for Co-Op. In the insurance industry, Co-Ops are called Mutual Companies, or Mutual Legal Reserves.
Credit Unions are owned by their members. When you join, you must establish a share account and maintain a minimum balance. Your share account is your capital investment in the company. You are paid dividends on your savings and checking accounts. Dividends are your share of the Credit Unions profits. A Credit Union offers benefits for its members such as preference on home and automobile loans.
An Electric Membership Corporation (EMC) is a service cooperative owned by those who receive its services. There are nearly 1,000 electric cooperatives in the United States. When the EMC makes a profit, those profits are shared with customers through credits to their electric bills, or lower rates.
Health Insurance Co-Ops
Health Care Services Corporation (HCSC) is the largest customer owned health insurer in the United States.
So if America wants to convert its health insurance industry to Co-Ops, the question is how? Obviously, it would be unfair, and foolish, to force the existing insurers out of business, so how do you get them to convert?
I am a proponent of Binary Economics. Under Binary Economics, the only role of Government in private enterprise is to offer interest-free loans through its central bank. Existing publicly traded insurers will need to buy back all of their stock in order to make the conversion to mutual companies. Interest free loans from the Government will facilitate this conversion. The loans will be paid back over the long-term out of the profits of the insurers. Once the loans have been paid, the insured will be able to participate in a larger share of company profits. Profits will be shared with policy holders either in the form of dividends, or lower insurance rates.
Interest free loans are not hand-outs, or bailouts. The money gets paid back. Granting interest free loans would be a much better use of taxpayers money than the current foolishness being promoted by certain 'linear' thinkers (right and left). The World is not flat. In fact, most good ideas come from outside of the box.
Reforms I can believe in:
Reforms I dont believe in:
click images to enlarge
Sources:
http://www.hcsc.com/about-hcsc/overview.html
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mutualcompany.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-op
http://www.waltonemc.com/mycoop/
http://larrymwalkerjr.blogspot.com/2009/08/government-insurance-vs-private.html
Like the cartoon!
Unfortunately, this is not a good time to look at these sorts of plans, because they WILL be turned into something else by those who want more centralization.
I had been thinking of having something like “Fair Plan” for property owners. I once bought an uninsurable fixer-upper house that had been vandalized. “Fair Plan”, a shared-risk pool created by all of the property insurance companies, allowed me to buy insurance so I could fix up the house. It wasn’t inexpensive, but it was at least available.
Perhaps something similar could be set up for those with pre-existing conditions. But not now, because we cannot have such a thing implemented by weasels.
I totally agree with this!
bookmark
“Interest free loans are not hand-outs, or bailouts.”
Really? In a private market, firms have to pay a price to use someone else’s capital, just as they have to pay the market rate for land, labor and fixed capital. If investors can earn a real rate of return on Treasury bills of 3% (a nominal rate of 4-6% depending on inflation), then we can be certain that private firms will have to pay an even higher interest rate, i.e., 5, 6, 7, 8% etc. to borrow the capital they need to run a health insurance company. Given that private health insurers earn a profit of only about 3.5%, letting coops borrow at no interest confers them a rather large market advantage.
On what grounds can you justify having the government play favorites in this fashion?
My idea is to convert the entire health insurance industry to co-ops, not to create a competing entity. The companies would thus be owned by those whom they insure, not by outside investors.
It’s hard to justify charging interest on money that’s fresh off the press, backed by nothing, and given to banks for free. On what grounds is interest charged at all?
My bank pays me around 0.25% on savings, but is more than willing to give me a credit card with a 28% interest rate. How fair is that?
BTW: I am a proponent of “Binary Economics”.
HMO, take II
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.