Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UNPRESEDENTED! Obama Has Chosen HIMSELF as Chairman of UN(UNCONSTITUTIONAL!)
Right Soup ^ | September 9, 2009 | Erin

Posted on 09/17/2009 5:35:25 AM PDT by opentalk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: opentalk
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Do you really think it would be hard for him to get congressional approval if pressed?
21 posted on 09/17/2009 5:57:28 AM PDT by IronKros (The pig put foot. Grunt. Foot in what? ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
"how is he doing all this and nobody says anything?"

I'm seeing a clearer picture of Obama each day.

OBAMA IS GOVERNING BY USING ACORN TACTICS!!

Using tax payer money to do with as they please & doing whatever underhanded, illegal things that they feel entitled to do.

I can definitely see the connection between ACORN & their community organizer trainer!!

22 posted on 09/17/2009 5:57:33 AM PDT by LADY J (Change your thoughts and you change your world. - Norman Vincent Peale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

23 posted on 09/17/2009 5:59:05 AM PDT by maggief (He had a dream. We got a nightmare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Good work, but please spell-check title.


24 posted on 09/17/2009 5:59:58 AM PDT by Marylander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

demand audits of everything


25 posted on 09/17/2009 6:00:29 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

“how is he doing all this and nobody says anything?”

Anyone who points out any wrongdoing, or levels any criticism against Zero is called a racist by his cronies in the media and in government.


26 posted on 09/17/2009 6:03:33 AM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
"demand audits of everything"

The Republicans have more power than they think. They need to be OUT IN FRONT & CALLING OBAMA OUT on all the illegal things that he is doing.

If we know & see what's going on - either they are deaf & blind or haven't got the guts to man up & protect us & our constitution.

We need to flood them with calls & emails to get them off their butts!

27 posted on 09/17/2009 6:05:14 AM PDT by LADY J (Change your thoughts and you change your world. - Norman Vincent Peale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

bookmark


28 posted on 09/17/2009 6:06:59 AM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Well, it’s not really unconstitutional (after all, if the phrasing makes it unconstitutional for POTUS to chair the UN security council, it also makes it unconstitutional for anyone at all in the executive branch including the UN Ambassador to chair it).

However, it is absurdly egomaniacal. My guess is that when the public actualy sees this ridiculous spectacle, O’s ratings will plunge some more.

Of course, I was the one that laughed out loud at his campaign speeches last year and thought that nobody could actually believe his claptrap.


29 posted on 09/17/2009 6:13:05 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

That’s my question. HOW IS IT THAT HE CAN DO ALL OF THIS WITH NO CHALLENGES? FROM ANYONE!


30 posted on 09/17/2009 6:14:11 AM PDT by MizSterious (Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm? John Page, 1744-1808)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government

The point of the clause is that the president shouldn’t have divided loyalties.

As president and UN chief he would have a conflict of interest. Should he do what is best for the USA or what is best for the UN?

It many not techically be a government, but in spirit the UN is. The have a military authority (that uses troops borrowed from various countries) and they have at times taken over the governing of countries that have fallen into chaos.

Most importantly, the UN has waged war. The Korean war was authorized by a UN vote. Technicall, the UN was in charge of the Korean war.


31 posted on 09/17/2009 6:14:13 AM PDT by Brookhaven (http://theconservativehand.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
As president and UN chief he would have a conflict of interest.

I think he's just heading up a meeting, not assuming the mantle of UN leadership. At least, that's the way I read it. I have some questions/thoughts at post #14 that I hope will be answered by somebody here who knows more than me.

Maybe it IS unconstitutional to chair a meeting at the UN. I don't know. Evidentally, it is unprecedented. But right now I can't figure out how we can make a leap from this meeting to a position of leadership within the organization.

I just want to be careful to have my facts right and not fly off the handle here.
32 posted on 09/17/2009 6:21:00 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

He’s not chief of the UN.

The United States is presiding over the UN Security Council. As President of the United States, Obama designates who will represent the United States at the meeting and act as presiding officer. He has designated himself.

It’s unwise, arrogant, and just plain stupid, for a host of reasons, but it’s not illegal or unconstitutional.


33 posted on 09/17/2009 6:22:11 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Jimmy Carter".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970
I just want to be careful to have my facts right and not fly off the handle her

I'll make an easier solution. GET US OUT OF THE UNITED NATIONS NOW!!!

34 posted on 09/17/2009 6:24:03 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -Arthur C Clarke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sanchmo
Well, it’s not really unconstitutional (after all, if the phrasing makes it unconstitutional for POTUS to chair the UN security council, it also makes it unconstitutional for anyone at all in the executive branch including the UN Ambassador to chair it).

I do believe you are wrong. The U.N. Ambassador is confirmed before the Senate and he is paid for filling that position. If the President sits to be confirmed for the position and takes the pay cut, I suppose he can chair the Council. Relevant words in the Constitution-- without the Consent of the Congress,. I think it is also against the law somewhere for someone to get two salaries from the government, but I could be wrong on that. That said, don't hold your breath for these guys to obey the Constitution.

35 posted on 09/17/2009 6:24:56 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
how is he doing all this and nobody says anything?

They all have guns to their heads?

36 posted on 09/17/2009 6:25:12 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (...We never faced anything like this...we only fought humans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

I think the UN requires a Birth Certificate.


37 posted on 09/17/2009 6:25:17 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970

Other articles in free republic:

Barack Obama, Ruler of the World and Appeaser of Rouge States ?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2333031/posts

Obama to chair UN Security Council
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2335334/posts

Obama’s Latest Gambit: Chairing the Security Council
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2333068/posts?page=1


38 posted on 09/17/2009 6:25:58 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Carley
" The ROYAL jackass is so perfect for the UN. "

There now, fixed.
39 posted on 09/17/2009 6:26:10 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970
What stood out for me (link )is that Obama gets to set the agenda of the meeting, including what is not dicussed.

A power move to control the agenda. From link:

“This seemingly innocuous language has two profoundly disturbing features. First, UN documents indicate that the Security Council is currently dealing with over 100 issues. While “non-proliferation” is mentioned, “disarmament” is not. “

“Second, Obama’s agenda preference indicates that he is dead-set against chairing a session on the non-proliferation issues already on the council’s plate — those that name Iran and North Korea.”

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWNkMWViY2YyZjU5OTY5ZDcyNDQ1MzIwY2NkNWUyOTU=

40 posted on 09/17/2009 6:26:47 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson