Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top U.S. Afghanistan Commander Asks President Obama for a "Surge" in Afghanistan - Video 9/16/09
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | September 17, 2009 | BrianinMO

Posted on 09/17/2009 5:05:07 AM PDT by Federalist Patriot

Here is a video report on the request by top U.S. Commander in Afghanistan - Gen. Stanley McChrystal - for a "surge" of troops in Afghanistan. This report says the request made to President Obama is for "tens of thousands" of additonal troops. Other reports are saying it is in the 30,000-40,000 range. We currently have 62,000 troops in Afghanistan, with another 6,000 to be there by year's end. Such a "surge" would put U.S. Forces over the 100,000 mark in Afghanistan.

The report says Obama has signaled he will be very slow in making a decision, largely because many of those in his own party have already begun the same, tired rhetoric they used to argue against the "Surge" in Iraq - which wound up being a fabulous success. Of course, Obama himself, as a Senator, was one of those Democrats arguing against the "surge" in Iraq, saying it would be a disaster. He was totally wrong.

Now, as President, he gets to decide whether he will listen to the commanders in the field as to what it will take to finish the job in Afghanistan, or whether he will follow his own instincts and choose failure, as his party will push him to do.

Obama's judgment about the "surge" strategy in Iraq would have brought about the fulfillment of Sen. Harry Reid's statement "the war is lost." President George W. Bush listened to his commanders - and voices like Sen. John McCain - and implemented the Surge in Iraq despite great political pressure not to do so. Because of that, victory was achieved. Will President Obama now have the wisdom and strength to do the same in Afghanistan?

(VIDEO)

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; mhmmdnsm09172009; surgestrategy

1 posted on 09/17/2009 5:05:08 AM PDT by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Doesn’t matter how many troops they have there if they can’t kill the bad guys for fearing of injuring civilians.


2 posted on 09/17/2009 5:07:26 AM PDT by bigheadfred (NEGROMANCER!!!! Run for your LIVES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
This report says the request made to President Obama is for "tens of thousands" of additional troops. Other reports are saying it is in the 30,000-40,000 range.

How is "tens of thousands" different than "30,000-40,000"?

3 posted on 09/17/2009 5:10:47 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

Paging code pink.......


4 posted on 09/17/2009 5:23:49 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

What good will a surge do if our troops are not allowed, by the ROE, to close with, engage, and kill the enemy?


5 posted on 09/17/2009 5:50:22 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson