Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: uscabjd

I don’t know..Liebernman involved Doctor patient..reasonable expectation of privacy, the question is did Acorn have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their office..have to see the layout door was open, could conversation be overhead etc..also if I recall correctly there is no reasonable expectation of privacy while discussing criminal activity as it goes against public policy..interesting to see what happens

http://www.rcfp.org/taping/states/california.html


31 posted on 09/15/2009 3:33:30 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone

You’re right - it’s a question of fact. I don’t know about the “crime” exception. The only exception I can think of off hand is for law enforcement.


33 posted on 09/15/2009 3:38:20 PM PDT by uscabjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: rolling_stone

You make good points. They are strangers, walking into a place of business that dispenses public money. Doesn’t sound confidential to me, especially after a couple glasses of excellent Ridgeline Cabernet.


41 posted on 09/15/2009 8:20:35 PM PDT by uscabjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson