No, it is not.
The Bomford certificate is genuine. All you people are doing by trying to claim a legitimate Australian birth certificate of exactly the same design as every other South Australian birth certificate of the period, and totally different to Kenyan birth certificates is a fake is making yourselves look like a bunch of dupes. Any claims you then make about anything else can be easily dismissed.
I have see HUNDREDS of Australian birth certificates in my life. I know what the things look like. I’m trying to stop you shooting yourselves in the foot. There are 20 million Australians who know what Australian birth certificates look like - a few million of them are South Australians.
so google Bomford BC
The BC that this Lucas fellow has IS NOT the Bomford Australian one from about a month or more ago—things are getting jumbled.
HOWEVER the one that the Lucas man SAYS he got from paying off some Kenyan official—and I assume is the one Taitz is talking about-—has authenticity problems too from what Jerome Corsi says.
Who the heck knows what is going on.
I find the signature on the Bomford document troubling:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308435/posts?page=549#549
The template of the Bomford certificate may be genuine, but I believe this particular BC (the Bomford one from the geneology site) was proven forged, due to a number of obvious inconsistencies. The one which did it for me was the fact that letters did not change at all across fold lines — straight text photoshopped over.
The Bomford was proven to be a fraud ... unless you believe the typed form of the exhibit would be over the signature on the exhibit. But nice try there ...