[naturalman1975]

Bless your confused little heart, I have not made even one comment regarding the Soetoro BC, just addressed the obvious contradiction in the Online posted Bomford exhibit. And, BTW littleone, that Axelgreasy talking point regarding ‘helping conservatives to not make fools of themselves’ has been dismissed at FR. We happen to be able to walk and chew gum. But you’re making a gamey try, stinky

I'm not confused and the childish insults really don't impress me. And, frankly, while I have no doubt most people here can walk and chew gum, I don't think there's that many posting at the moment who are capable of forensically examining an image file. I also don't think there's anybody here who knows as much about Australian documentation as I do.

The alleged Obama certificate based off Bomford is about as genuine as a three dollar note. You wouldn't accept one of those. People shouldn't be accepting that.

I don't know if you believe it's real or not. I don't really care to be honest. It's not about one person. It's about the fact that there are a lot of people who've apparently been taken in by an obvious fake whose true provenance is quite easy to establish.

[null and void]

FWIW, I vehemently disagree with naturalman1975 on this one, but he has been a stand-up guy as long as I've known him. I respect his politics and knowledge. He's one of the good guys.

(wrong on this issue, though)...

[null and void]

To: Fresh Wind

It doesn’t take any particularly deep analysis to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the Bomford BC is a doctored fraud. The floating text alone would bust it hopelessly in court.

49 posted on Tue Aug 4 16:06:26 2009 by editor-surveyor

To: editor-surveyor

Yup....I agree. No distortion or bending of the Type

This is obvious:

51 posted on 08/04/2009 5:46:01 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti