Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Water Torture via Alinsky Rules applied to ACORN
Flopping Aces ^ | 09-14-09 | Aye Chihuahua

Posted on 09/14/2009 9:46:00 AM PDT by Starman417

Alinsky Rule #10, “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.”

This Alinsky rule is much like Chinese water torture.

Drip. Drip. Drip.

Steady. Unrelenting.

Drip. Drip. Drip.

The festering sore first came to light in Baltimore. Those tapes were released on Thursday September 10th.

Then, on Friday, it broke out in Washington, DC.

Now, the pus filled, red, oozy spot has erupted in New York.

[VIDEO AT SITE]

Damn those isolated incidents.

Second video from New York below the fold.

What will tomorrow bring?

Drip. Drip. Drip.

[VIDEO AT SITE]

Exit question: How many isolated incidents does it take to indicate a pattern?

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: acorn; alinsky; obama

1 posted on 09/14/2009 9:46:00 AM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I hope they have about 10 more of them.


2 posted on 09/14/2009 9:52:51 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
The best part is watching ACORN adjust its excuses. At first they claimed that Baltimore was an isolated case. Then with DC they claimed that Breitbart tried a large number of cities but ACORN didn't respond in ______ (they listed a number of cities, including New York). Now there's a New York video.
3 posted on 09/14/2009 9:58:38 AM PDT by KarlInOhio ("I can run wild for six months ...after that, I have no expectation of success" - Admiral Obama-moto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
I hope they have about 10 more of them.

Seriously, three is *plenty* for me. It's time to bring RICO to bear - but we can wait a few months if necessary and cast a wider net.

4 posted on 09/14/2009 9:59:30 AM PDT by The Duke ("Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Democrat Party?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

Having 20 would make it VERY hard for anyone to argue against it as a pattern.


5 posted on 09/14/2009 10:08:27 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
>>>Having 20 would make it VERY hard for anyone to argue against it as a pattern.<<<

Three verifiable instances of aiding and abetting prostitution and housing fraud, under inditement for vote fraud in 14 states, at least 4 convictions in seperate cases of voter fraud, unauditable spending of government funds given to Acorn....

....and you want more evidence.

6 posted on 09/14/2009 10:18:01 AM PDT by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: OneWingedShark
Having 20 would make it VERY hard for anyone to argue against it as a pattern.

Three is plenty. Obama and company would dearly love us to set the bar higher than these young, patriotic college students can afford (at least without pulling a 'Geitner' on their income taxes).

I'm sure plenty of crimes have been successfully prosecuted with less than 20 pieces of evidence - why give communists usurpers any special considerations?

8 posted on 09/14/2009 11:37:22 AM PDT by The Duke ("Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Democrat Party?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

>I’m sure plenty of crimes have been successfully prosecuted with less than 20 pieces of evidence - why give communists usurpers any special considerations?

I’m not saying that at all; what I’m saying is I want it to be blatantly irrefutable so that the hypocrisy & corruption is visible to EVERYONE.

IE Discrediting ACORN so badly that finding someone who “doesn’t care” or supports ACORN would be regarded as a statistical anomaly; further, showing ALL Americans the metal of our DOJ (ie if they don’t prosecute [vigorously] it would be a HUGE black mark on government).


9 posted on 09/14/2009 12:40:18 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson