To: Jabrown
I think the notion that Barack Obama will not be renominated in 2012 now has to be seriously considered.
So where do the Democrats go? Hillary?
22 posted on
09/07/2009 7:25:38 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Carbon offsets? Sounds like the Environmental Church wants us to buy climate indulgences.)
To: MNJohnnie
23 posted on
09/07/2009 7:30:56 AM PDT by
benjibrowder
(For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
To: MNJohnnie
if you listen closely...it the radicals who believe that Obama is not pushing hard enough that want to nominate someone new...the funny thing is where are these loons gonna find anyone further left than Obama. Are they planning on resurrecting Marx.
25 posted on
09/07/2009 7:42:35 AM PDT by
Jabrown
To: MNJohnnie
But let us not forget that, like Obama, Hillary is more than likely also a disciple of Saul Alinsky, as evidenced by her Wellesley senior thesis on the man.
At this point, she may appear to be the lesser of two evils as a Democrat candidate in '12. But when it comes to Marxism (or whatever 'ism' you want to call it), her approach may be more trojan horse compared to Obama's bull-in-a-china-shop.
She's still Hillary Clinton, which means I still don't trust her.
To: MNJohnnie
A democrat presidential primary season in 2012 with a re-match of Hussein and Hillary would be entertaining beyond belief.
If these two Marxists go toe to toe again, I’m going to seriously consider going into the popcorn business.
30 posted on
09/07/2009 7:59:45 AM PDT by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(The AFL-CIO and SEIU.....two domestic terrorist organizations doing Obama's dirty work for him.)
To: MNJohnnie
Almost certainly Hillary.
In fact, it will be surprising if she’s still the SECSTATE after 2010 or so.
31 posted on
09/07/2009 8:09:18 AM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(Fides et Audax)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson