Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PULL DOWN THE S.E.C!
The Fruits of Graft ^ | Sept. 3, 2009 | Wayne Jett

Posted on 09/06/2009 9:59:59 AM PDT by n-tres-ted

That Bernard Madoff’s multi-billion dollar fraud flourished for many years under the nose of the Securities & Exchange Commission is a powerful indictment of the SEC as a complicit handmaiden of Wall Street corruption of enormous scale. The SEC Inspector General, who is supposed to be autonomous but strangely must submit his reports directly to the agency he is required to watchdog, has been investigating how this so-called specialty regulator managed to miss such rampant fraud for so long. On September 2, the SEC released an “executive summary” of 22 pages signed by the IG David Kotz August 31. Its concluding statements are: “despite numerous credible and detailed complaints, the SEC never properly examined or investigated Madoff’s trading and never took the necessary, but basic, steps to determine if Madoff was operating a Ponzi scheme. Had these efforts been made with appropriate follow-up at any time beginning in June of 1992 until December, 2008, the SEC could have uncovered the Ponzi scheme well before Madoff confessed.”

(Excerpt) Read more at classicalcapital.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: fraud; madoff; reform; sec
If we want to stop being robbed, we have to do something about it.
1 posted on 09/06/2009 10:00:00 AM PDT by n-tres-ted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

I dont know how much of it is outright corruption, how much is indifference, and how much is SEC lawyers auditioning for jobs at the law firms where they really want to work. But what does it matter, the point is that the agency is useless for protecting investors from crooks.


2 posted on 09/06/2009 10:08:26 AM PDT by freespirited (Liberals are only liberal about sex & drugs. Otherwise, they want to control your life. --DHorowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

OK for 10 Xtra Credit Points... Who was the first “Chairman” of the “SEC”?


3 posted on 09/06/2009 10:11:16 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
Who was the first “Chairman” of the “SEC”?

Ted's dad?

4 posted on 09/06/2009 10:53:01 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (You can never have too much cowbell !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Didn’t FDR say it takes a crook to catch a crook?


5 posted on 09/06/2009 10:54:07 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (You can never have too much cowbell !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955

BINGO YOU WIN!


6 posted on 09/06/2009 10:55:40 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955

Yes, FDR said something like that. Which means neither that what he said was true, nor that he even intended for a crook to be caught. After sifting through the tricky language, the historical fact is that he put a crook in charge so neither that crook nor any other big crook would ever be bothered.


7 posted on 09/06/2009 9:21:22 PM PDT by n-tres-ted (Remember November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson