[tcrlaf]

This moron’s knowledge of history is laughable, AT BEST...

STALINGRAD was not the turning point in the East, it was KURSK, in July 1943, 6 months AFTER Stalingrad, followed by the Soviet Summer Offensive after it, that spelled doom for the Germans in the East, they RECOVERED from Stalingrad, but could not recover from the losses suffered at Kursk, and never regained the initiative after that.

[joey703]

No Mention of SOVIET, or CHI-COM support of the North Koreans however... How unbiased this article is!!1 C’mon now, everybody repeat after me: EVERYTHING, EVERYWHERE, is America’s fault!!! you on the other hand i have no hope for.

[joey703]

for example, assuming "STALINGRAD was not the turning point in the East, it was KURSK, in July 1943, 6 months AFTER Stalingrad, followed by the Soviet Summer Offensive after it, that spelled doom for the Germans in the East, they RECOVERED from Stalingrad, but could not recover from the losses suffered at Kursk, and never regained the initiative after that." were true, which clearly is not. Stalingrad was the point where it no longer mattered what the Germans had and which battles they might win (such as a Kursk), but at that point, it was set that the Russians would win. What was not set was how long it would take...