You say those are the words of the KCNA mouthpiece, but you fail to read how heavily I have criticized North Korea, go as far back as 2003 (if you'd like). While I may have been on this site since 98 I did follow this site for about a decade before registering in 2003....
The natural order of things also include those, perhaps those such as yourself, who do not possess the IQ or the level of reasoning to be able to express their opinions in a concise manner without resorting to language that you gives your words as much legitmacy or weight as the words Communist or as the word's Democratic or People's give to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea....
Not only that, but you express an opinion solely based against what somebody else expresses...
But, for all others that may take your words seriously, look beyond the obvious.
The period from 1947 to 1991 is a very short piece of history. And, a clear look at those two articles speak for itself.
Why are you asking ME this? This "natural order of thing" argument is yours, not mine. And frankly, I don't know quite what it means except that in the author's mind it means that Communist insurgencies ought to have been allowed to engage in subversion at their will with no resistance from the West, or specifically from the United States, because that upsets the "natural order of things".
I hope you won't be too offended if I point out that this is gratuitous circular reasoning.
I could just as easily point out that the communist insurgencies were disturbing the "natural order of things" in their native societies when they began to engage in subversion and armed revolution, but I wouldn't. Why? Because the entire line of reasoning is specious.