Posted on 09/01/2009 8:13:01 AM PDT by HorowitzianConservative
Edited on 09/01/2009 8:15:42 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
In the current issue of American Renaissance, Jared Taylor replies to these comments and raises the fundamental question of whether America is or should be a multiethnic, multiracial society, or whether it was conceived and should be preserved "as a self-consciously European, majority-white Nation." Among literate conservatives, Jared Taylor is the most blunt in expressing this vision, but it is a theme of others who might be called "Euro-racialists." (This is a bastardized and somewhat incoherent coinage, but one that adequately describes a bastardized and somewhat incoherent perspective).
Horowitz is a phony. I don’t admire him. He says people who talk about Obama’s birth certificate have Obama derangement syndrome. I heard Horowitz say to radio hosts who were criticizing Obama that they couldn’t accept the fact that we have a black in the white house. And now he complains about the agenda of people like Pat Buchanan with immigration?
Why did David Horowitz use the term “literate conservatives”? Notwithstanding the issue at hand, i.e., Jared Taylor and his writings, it seems to me that David Horowitz is taking an undue slap at all conservatives.
Is Rush Limbaugh an IL-literate conservative? Who are the non-literate conservatives according to David Frum, no wait, I meant Horowitz!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.