[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

The warmers would have us believe that CO2 can somehow escape this law of nature and hold more energy than its mass, chemical composition, and physical state can allow for.

While I agree completely with the theme of this commentary — I also completely disagree with the above statement. It's just plain gibberish.

There are so many good reasons to reject the AGW hypothesis — this isn't one of them. It just creates a straw-man for the warm-mongers to knock down.

[Danae]

Its also true.

Co2 is a gas.

Water for instance; it exists here as ice, which can absorb heat and change state to water. It can absorb heat again and change state to a gas.

CO2 cannot do that because it is already a gas, and it is why CO2 is irrelevant in global warming. It cannot hold any more heat energy.

[OldSpice]

In the original article in #6, none of that is mentioned.