Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/25/2009 1:22:51 PM PDT by clyde_m
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: clyde_m
The rules work equally well for a right wing group as they do for a left wing group. This is something that many of the lefties don't understand. Now that they are in power we can use all of their best tools on them.

Also by knowing the rules you can defeat them. For example never allow your group to be identified with a single individual. If the individual is taken out then your whole movement goes down the drain. And an individual is much easier to destroy than an idea.
2 posted on 08/25/2009 1:37:00 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: clyde_m

The author of this piece sticks to ridiculing Alinsky’s rules, but in doing so he misses the biggest point: THEY WORK. Alinsky’s rules don’t work because most people in the world are smart and well-informed. They work specifically because they play to the flaws that are present more often than not in most human beings . The author can say that these rules are stupid all he wants, but these rules still work. Obama is proof of that.


4 posted on 08/25/2009 2:02:42 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: clyde_m
Photobucket

From “Rules for Radicals” by Obama’s hero, Saul Alinsky:

RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

QUESTIONS?


6 posted on 08/25/2009 2:33:30 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: clyde_m

Bookmark


8 posted on 08/25/2009 2:49:43 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: clyde_m
Act irrationally. Seems like a theme.

No. He's saying act rationally (stay within your zone of expertise, for example) but make use of emotional (i.e. irrational appeals). It's Machiavelli all over again.

These statements conflict, Saul.

Sure. You have to feel your way as you go. So you push and push and push one tactic and it works (rule 10). Then it doesn't (rule 7). So you have to come up with a new approach. That happens a lot in politics, business or war. After a while, you may get a gut feeling where rule 10 applies and where rule 7 works. It may be wrong, but it's better than nothing.

10 posted on 08/25/2009 3:17:56 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; MeekOneGOP; ...
Trouble is we’ve never come up with an effective defense against the race card so they play it again, and again, and again until it comes to mean, anything any black person anywhere doesn’t like.

Add Alinsky's Rules for Radicals to "COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum. (Trolling 101)" ... and beat them at their own game.

15 posted on 09/07/2009 11:40:26 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: clyde_m

Rules for Radicals was dedicated to Lucifer.

And he is more than happy to continue to use its tenets to “steal and kill and destroy.”


16 posted on 09/08/2009 4:33:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Remember the Notre Dame 88.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson