No we really are not on the “same side”. You see you are willing to allow the Constitution to be used as our death knell and I am not.
Plenty of Jews in Germany were Good Germans, thought that the law would protect them. All they had to do was obey the laws and then they would be okay. Thought the courts would protect them. Wrong on all counts. The faith practised by followers of Muhammed does not allow for moderation. The ROP will kill the converts first and slowly strangle the rest of anyone not doing what “they” want. The enemy is Islam. I have yet to see a Muslim who is not “bound” by the commandment to slay a convert. Plenty of those who Live every day wondering whether today will be the day that someone catches up with them. Keep in mind that the honor killings we hear about in Canada, Europe, and even here in the States have all been done by those moderates you are sooo willing to protect.
Can you see the similarity between your argument and the arguments of leftists who equate tea parties with klan rallies and want to shut down conservative talk radio because it "inspires hate?" All because some nut from Security, Colorado shot at the Clinton White House because local "right wing" host Chuck Baker was railing against Clinton. Then came Tim McVeigh.
You are right that the most important issue here is that girl's safety. The constitution is also important. You can't ignore it or skirt around it one time then stand behind it another. Either it means something or it doesn't.
By your logic, all kids should be taken from their Muslim families now as a preventive measure against honor killings. Sorry, preventive justice is not allowed here.
Now, where we probably agree is that my remedy is to cease all immigration by Muslims or any other culture that has proved incompatible with ours and impervious to assimilation. That's the worst part of all this: We brought in on ourselves with our ridiculous immigration policies.
Who knows how many more honor killings are in this nation's future? How do we prevent them while staying within the bounds of our constitution?