Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Pour yourself a cup of refreshment, then come back and join me in learning some more Constitutional history; history that you will be teaching to future generations for decades to come. What I have I uncovered is the ‘nuclear bombshell’ that blows Obama’s claims to constitutional eligibility to smithereens.

http://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/08/21/constitutional-nuclear-bomb-blasts-obamas-eligibilty-to-smithereens/

1 posted on 08/22/2009 12:07:48 AM PDT by patlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: patlin

Instead of asking candidates on the state registration forms if they are “constitutionally eligible”, I guess they should spell it out... “I was born in the United States, and both of my parents are citizens of the United States”.

So I guess Obama will be able to beat the fraud rap after all when there’s a legitimate legal question of what constitutionally eligible means.


2 posted on 08/22/2009 12:11:44 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin

Below is from George Washington’s Farewell Address!

Warns against the party system.

“It serves to distract the Public Councils, and
enfeeble the Public Administration....agitates
the Community with ill-founded jealousies and
false alarms; kindles the animosity of one....
against another....
it opens the door to foreign influence and
corruption...thus the policy and the will of one
country are subjected to the policy and will of
another.”


4 posted on 08/22/2009 1:11:35 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin

Link

http://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/08/21/constitutional-nuclear-bomb-blasts-obamas-eligibilty-to-smithereens/


5 posted on 08/22/2009 1:23:35 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin
Obama was almost certainly never naturalized. He is either a natural born citizen or a non-citizen. The fact that he has held a US passport since age 5 or 6 argues for the former.

However, I, like you, would like to see the evidence.

And welcome to Free Republic!

6 posted on 08/22/2009 2:06:29 AM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin
Obama claims that his British citizenship changed to Kenyan citizenship in 1963 when Kenya gained their freedom from British rule, he also claims that since he did not act on that Kenyan citizenship upon coming of age (another clever smoke screen), this inaction automatically caused him to lose his Kenyan citizenship. That may be, however, research has shown that at the coming of age, Kenyans who were born during the time of British rule, had to formally renounce their British citizenship for if they did not, they would remain subjects of Great Britain and subject to the rule of the monarchy.

So then in other words, Obama is a British citizen, and his claim that he let it lapse in 1982? is a mere smokescreen. He would have had to formally renounce it, which he never did.

So, the questions remain, what country’s passports has Obama travelled on during his extensive world travels in the 80’s & 90’s when he was a poor struggling college & law student as well as his travels abroad while he was a US Senator?

a British passport???

10 posted on 08/22/2009 6:01:16 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin

Any Congressman or Senator who does not understand and follow Justice Story’s line of reasoning is NOT fit to Serve!


11 posted on 08/22/2009 6:27:53 AM PDT by Jude in WV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin

Congratulations, patlin! Clear, concise and devastating analysis.

It should be required reading for all members of Congress, Scotus and media mouthpieces with an obligatory public response [rebuttal, if they have the ‘audacity’]. Not that they aren’t all knowingly part of the deception.

The mistake made by Justice Roberts when administering the oath of office to BO, always struck me as rather curious. Technically, it was not a valid oath. Did he know BO was ineligible? Was it an intentional slip? Did his conscience impose a moral restraint that made him administer the oath in the privacy of the White House without the traditional swearing on the Bible?


13 posted on 08/22/2009 8:39:16 AM PDT by emissarium (Obligatory Public Response)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin

Welcome to Free Republic!


14 posted on 08/22/2009 12:39:40 PM PDT by roylll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Bookmark


23 posted on 08/22/2009 6:46:09 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson