[shibumi]

"Give me a break. If the media would actually do its job and report and investigate the Liberals then I would agree with you but until I see the MSM do an actual indept REAL hardball report on anyone on the left I will be forced to belive things like this.... You keep right on looking through those rose colored glasses polyanna and when this story eventually pans out to be true you can Apologize to me then."


That's surely a good, solid, logical analysis of the facts as presented here.

Let's see if I get this right. You feel it is incumbent on you to believe any bit of scurrilous reporting, no matter the lack of credible sourcing, because other news sources, reporting on unrelated topics do not perform to your expectations.

In addition to an irrelevant conclusion, drawn from affirming the consequent, your questionable reasoning includes a non sequitur.

I think we should start an "Apologize to Typical Whitey Ping List" so that if any credible evidence of Santaria in the White House ever surfaces, we can give you your due props.

(By the way, what is "indept" reporting? Some combination of "adept" and "in depth"?)

[DJ MacWoW]

We sit here on FR laughing at the DU slurping up this kind of crap. There isn't one single named source in this.

"A close friend of Michelle Obama "
"Michelle’s friend said"
"the friend said. "

Yeah. That's a reliable source. *snort*

[TigersEye]

Please add me to your ping list.