Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama setting up Politburo Czar leadership in White House?
Examiner.com ^ | August 7, 2009 | Martha

Posted on 08/07/2009 7:58:15 AM PDT by usalady

When even a Democrat like Senator Robert Byrd objects to President Obama setting up a collective leadership of Czars in the White House, perhaps it is time for Americans to look more carefully at what appears to be a replica of a Soviet-style Politburo. These appointees do not have to be approved by Congress yet play controlling roles in the lives of Americans.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: bhoczars; bhofascism; bhotyranny; czars; obama; obamaczars; obamapolitburo; whitehouseczars
The term Politburo refers to the supreme policy-making body of the Communist party of the Soviet Union and became the model for other dictatorships in Eastern Europe. The first Politburo was created in 1917 to provide appointed leadership during the Bolshevik uprising.
1 posted on 08/07/2009 7:58:15 AM PDT by usalady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: usalady

And not a Republican anywhere willing to bring this anti-Constitutional trend to the Supreme Court for a ruling. Unbelievable.


2 posted on 08/07/2009 7:59:56 AM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usalady

3 posted on 08/07/2009 8:00:49 AM PDT by fightinbluhen51 ("MOLON LABE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

The minute a Republican congress is elected these posts should be de-funded immediately.

I can dream, can’t I?


4 posted on 08/07/2009 8:02:46 AM PDT by cvq3842 (Countless thousands of our ancestors died to give us the freedoms we have today. Stay involved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: usalady

5 posted on 08/07/2009 8:04:11 AM PDT by McGruff (Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency - Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

But why not a Supreme Court case anyway, so we don’t have to keep revisiting this crap everytime into the future?


6 posted on 08/07/2009 8:07:49 AM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

No, I agree - we should do both.


7 posted on 08/07/2009 8:09:38 AM PDT by cvq3842 (Countless thousands of our ancestors died to give us the freedoms we have today. Stay involved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: usalady

Glad to see that others are picking up on the Politbureau BS Obama is trying to get away with. I made the same comment in this email to Sens Isakson and Chambliss to wit:

Senator,
A vote AGAINST Sonia Sotomayor will be a vote FOR principle.

Regardless of her testimony and responses, she is a dangerous leftist. And the argument by the increasingly silly and irrelevant Lindsey Graham that she is no worse than Souter is akin to a doctor telling you that your lung cancer is cured – but you have leukemia. I heard Graham remark that “The President has a right to get the people he wants.” That “logic” says that if Obama WANTS to abolish an elected legislature for a politbureau of his fellow Chicago thugs – which he is in the process of doing with his “czars,” — you should simply roll over, move on and let him have it. Good grief!!

Should you be tempted to vote FOR her to curry favor with Georgia’s large Hispanic population, you will be making a HUGE error in judgment. Thousands of them are non-citizens, here in violation of immigration laws and, in light of the recent idiotic Justice Department ruling that Georgia may NOT require voters to show ID, ACORN (or whatever they are calling themselves today) will drag them to the polls on election day anyway. And if you think they will vote for you because you supported Sotomayor, you had better think again: ACORN WILL INSTRUCT THEM VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT OR THEY WON’T GET THE PROMISED 20 BUCKS, PACK OF SMOKES OR WHATEVER.

VOTE “NO” ON SOTOMAYOR!
(End of email to senators)

BTW, Judge Andrew Napolitano and SENATOR ROBERT BYRD have both correctly commented that ANYTHING these clowns (czars) might do or say is UNLAWFUL on the basis that they were NOT voted on by the legislature. If they or one of their flunkies order you to do or not do something, TAKE IT TO COURT. I know, I know — it sounds like a lawyer make-work scheme (which it probably is) but filing a pro per suit in a federal court is not that hard and/or you could probably find a young land shark willing to do so pro bono — or close to it — so he can make his bones.


8 posted on 08/07/2009 8:20:00 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (ELECTION 2010 IS THE MOST IMPORTANT OF OUR LIFETIME! If you have to ask why, UR part of the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
Photobucket

9 posted on 08/07/2009 8:22:19 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (ELECTION 2010 IS THE MOST IMPORTANT OF OUR LIFETIME! If you have to ask why, UR part of the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: usalady

How can he not? Czars all around him.
He has taken control of the banking industry, he has moved into control of the Auto Industry, Hes moving into agriculture, the new health program... EVERY maor sector? The gov’t is now involved in all the major sectors.... the OBAMA govt is seeking to take control of the Govt....
Bankrupt the nation...
and then install a regime tougher than you can imagine..
Start learning how to march and lead a life under a totalitarian leader!
Be afraid of his czars!

It all looks innocent now.... be wary wary scared!


10 posted on 08/07/2009 8:25:46 AM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

Letter from Procter & Gamble Exec to Obama

Lou Pritchett submitted this to the New York Times under the title of “Obama, You Scare Me” but they never published it. Pritchett did say that his article managed to make it to the world wide web where circulation went ballistic.
Pritchett is a former vice president of Procter & Gamble and wrote “Stop Paddling and Start Rocking the Boat” as well as numerous books and periodicals.

Dear President Obama:

You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.

You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.

You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.

You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don’t understand it at its core.

You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming others.

You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.

You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America’ crowd and deliver this message abroad.

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of? the private sector.

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.

You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.

You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest? standard of living in the world.

You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics against certain banks and corporations.

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.

You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O’Relllys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.

Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8? years.

Lou Pritchett


11 posted on 08/07/2009 8:52:01 AM PDT by sunny48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: usalady

So he is basically screwing the democrat controlled congress and telling them they better do as they are told because he holds all the cards . Behind all this is the threat of black rioting if they try and mess with their boy and the dems know it


12 posted on 08/07/2009 9:01:57 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson