Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: joey703; AmericanInTokyo
There has been always a problem of outsiders inserting their own wish into predicting N. Korea's behavior. It has been this way for a long time.

For a decade or so, they, especially U.S. foreign policy establishments, had held onto the belief that N. Korea does what it does because they want to negotiate away nuclear card in return for hefty aid package and normalization with U.S.. However, they had no such intention. Time and again, when the talk on this issue may be about to gain a momentum, they broke off the talk on some trivial pretext, and proceeded to continue their nuclear project.

Now that N. Korean nuke is a reality, they entertain another ungrounded belief that N. Korea will stay where it is, having nuke and no further development (toward deploying nuke-tipped ICBM,) in return for nice rewards.

That is not going to work either. As long as Kim Jong-il is alive, they will continue to work toward that goal.

What is needed is 1) persistent containment; Keep all sanctions on, and 2) allow S. Korea and Japan to talk more openly about their nuclear options.

The latter is especially crucial, but imbeciles in Foggy Bottom won't hear about it.

3 posted on 08/05/2009 10:48:21 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster

What do you mean by persistent containment? Short of war, I think North Korea has the upper hand. What if North Korea sells nukes? Or missiles (Supposedly, Iran’s Shihab-3 that successfully sent a satellite to space is a modified form of North Korea’s Rodong Missile, you can check fas.org or globalsecurity.org).

Only when it comes to war does the U.S. have the upper hand (and by far).


4 posted on 08/05/2009 10:58:38 PM PDT by joey703 (northxkorea.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

the U.S. public will not be willing to spend a trillion dollars or send half a million soldiers as to fight for Korea (unless North Korea invades and kills 20,000 U.S. soldiers stationed near the DMZ overnight).


5 posted on 08/05/2009 10:59:47 PM PDT by joey703 (northxkorea.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Yes, this is precisely our weakness. Our blindness. And it crosses Republican (Condi Rice and Chris Hill come to mind) and Democrat administration alike. Only a few get it. In my book, TLR, you are one of those who “gets it” with respect to North Korea. And yet, it isn’t rocket science. Nor should it be. It is just an American lack of paying attention, which creates the byproduct of doing the same stupid thing over and over again, expecting different results, which is in and of itself indicative of a lack of both wisdom and historical memory.


9 posted on 08/05/2009 11:46:05 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (God Bless Our US Troops (Especially the Snipers). Active Duty, Reserve and Retired. Three Cheers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson