Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: buccaneer81
As an ENTERPRISE sailor, I obviously agree. However, I don't want the proud name attached to just any old carrier. CVN-65 was a revolutionary vessel, and the name should be reserved for an equally-revolutionary successor, like the first space battleship or something.

In the meantime, let's go back to giving carriers kickass names. You know, something like USS MANIFEST DESTINY or USS MAILED FIST -- something with an air of real menace.

B-chan
Former MM3
USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65)
GONAVY

52 posted on 08/05/2009 8:45:27 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Texan. Monarchist. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: B-Chan
IMHO CVs should be named after places where naval aviators made their names shine. Battlefields or other carriers are OK, too. Got a war hero or a dead politician to honor? That's what destroyers are for. They should never have named CV-42 after that dead commie.
75 posted on 08/06/2009 4:32:41 PM PDT by magslinger (Inside every father is a Bryan Mills waiting to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson