Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe

BTW - You would do well to read more C.H. Spurgeon (posted on your page) than the watered down gospel in the form of the (also posted) Four Spritual Laws. The theology of the two are opposed. Spurgeon would never go for such things. He certainly would NEVER speak in defense of a heretical cult.


152 posted on 08/05/2009 6:44:33 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: Sola Veritas; Jeff Head; Edward Watson
Spurgeon would never go for such things. He certainly would NEVER speak in defense of a heretical cult.

What we know of Spurgeon is what he spoke from the pulpit, not what he spoke in common conversation. I doubt very seriously if he would have attacked a political argument by claiming that the person he was speaking to was not worthy of respect because he had different religious views than Spurgeon.

You want to disparge people for their religious beliefs, do it on the religion threads. The rationality of Edward Watson's political views has nothing to do with whether or not he is a Mormon or a Hindu or anything else. His arguments stand on their own.

Unfortunatly yours don't.

155 posted on 08/05/2009 7:02:47 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson