Okay, then please explain the difference. Mr. Kim: born in the USA, but allegedly not a natural born citizen because parents Chinese subjects. Court rules otherwise.
Mr. Obama: born in USA, but allegedly not a natural born citizen because Father British subject.
How's this different exactly?
These days there are anchor babies, no legal parents required. Back then different laws and ICE regulations applied. Check those out and then continue yor deflection of reality.
LOL. You are asking me to check what ICE regulations were in place at a time when ICE did not exist. And you're accusing me of being detached from reality?
YOu have to be a NATURAL born kind and there is no way Obambi, with a Kenyan/British father, qualifies even if he were born on US soil.
SCOTUS precedent says otherwise.
Nothing about the COLB you defend qualifies as it is a poor forgery and has even been taken off the Obama site.
It's still there in multiple places. See links above.
If I refer to some British history in the days of Chaucer do you insist I use Chaucerian English? ICE did not but it is the current version of the Immigration organization and you are nitpicking and wasting our time.
Two known fervent pro-Obama sites out of dozens taht used to have it does not the matter prove. I believe they have removed it. When did you last check?
There is a Persian saying that describes what you are doing , it says putting both your feet into one shoe and (by inference refusing to budge because you cannot walk bu trefuse to admit it)