[2ndDivisionVet]

Are you deluded or obstinate (or both)? We've been over this again and again. Sure, the probability is that Mr. Obama will serve out his full four year term: The Democrat-led Congress and Supreme Court aren't looking for massive riots in the inner cities spreading out to the suburbs and rural areas. Plus he's a useful tool and lightening rod for the Democrats and gives them cover, as they can scream “RACIST!” at just about any opposition to his and their plans. Does that make it right? United States vs. Kim Wong Ark has absolutely NOTHING to do with this situation, as has been proved over and over again here on FR.

[curiosity]

Are you deluded or obstinate (or both)? We've been over this again and again.

Yes we have, and it's because you're the one who's obstinate.

Here's how our typical conversation goes:

You: To be a natural born citizen, you need two citizen parents.

Me: No you don't. US v. Kim Wong Ark clearly says you don't.

Then crickets.

Then the next day you repeat the line, "To be a natural born citizen, you need two citizen parents," as if no conversation had previously taken place.

Sometimes it goes a little differently. Instead of ignoring Kim Wong Ark, you say, without any basis, that it is not relevant to the current situation when it clearly is.

United States vs. Kim Wong Ark has absolutely NOTHING to do with this situation,

I see. So today you are choosing plan B. Okay, here we go.

The Kim Wong Ark case is directly relevant because it was a citizenship case. SCOTUS court ruled that Mr. Ark was a natural born citizen even though his parents were not. Please explain to me why that is different from the current situation.

as has been proved over and over again here on FR.

You can't prove something by simply repeating it over and over again.