Because of Hawaiian law, a person can hold a legitimate Hawaiian birth certificate and yet not even be born in the U.S. THAT bears directly on the as yet unenunciated definition of natural born citizen by the SCOTUS.
I knew about that. But wouldn't that BC have the place of birth on it? If so, wouldn't the electronic record have Kenya on it also after all the paper was digitized in 1991 or 2001 (I forgot the year)? Then wouldn't it be extremely unlikely that nobody in that office ever saw it that way? Is it possible that it was switched to Honolulu in the computer? Or just left blank in the database record?