Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
I thought you were an honest poster until I read the following blatant falsehood; why would you try to deceive readers at FR having been a freeper for so long?

"Nobody argues that a child born within the nation’s boundaries to a mother who is a citizen would NOT be natural-born."

58 posted on 07/29/2009 10:54:13 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Now I'm completely confused as to what you are arguing about.

Are you arguing that a child born on U.S. soil to a girl who is a U.S. citizen would NOT be a citizen?

Are you arguing that if a U.S. teenager sleeps with some visiting teenager from France, and gets pregnant, and has the child, that the child is NOT a U.S. citizen?

Or did my use of negatives confuse the issue?

My statement of fact is this: A child born on U.S. soil to girl who is a U.S. Citizen is a natural-born citizen of this country.

Do you disagree with this statement? If so, why?

73 posted on 07/29/2009 11:11:42 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson