It will be obvious if it's ever official. But a reporter saying something doesn't make it so. It's nearly 8 am in Hawaii and so far nothing has officially been said or posted.
You said — It’s nearly 8 am in Hawaii and so far nothing has officially been said or posted.
—
Note that I said the same thing about Lou Dobbs and his report regarding the State of Hawaii. I said that if it was false (which remained to be seen at that time), then it would be denied by the state, relatively soon, and that there would be news reports on it and posts here on Free Republic about it, too.
And that took about three days, before the denial came out from the State of Hawaii...
So, it may come and then again, it may not... and that remains to be seen. But, as it stands right now, this is the news report that has been given.
Oh... one more thing I should say here...
You said — It will be obvious if it’s ever official.
—
I should ask how “official” was it when the report came out that denied the paper birth certificate was *not destroyed*. I haven’t seen that one up on their website either.
As far as I know, the *second* a reporter said that — it was accepted as the “gospel truth*, and no confirmation directly from the State of Hawaii, other than the reporter himself... (but eventually that will come out, too... in the days to come... if it is true).
You see.... a lot of this accepting a reporter or not accepting a reporter *really* has to do with what one likes to hear and what one does not like to hear.
The better way to do it — is to simply accept the report as a “news report” and see if a denial comes up later or some kind of further proof comes up later that offsets it.
It would seem to me that many are “accepting” or “denying” according to what they prefer to hear...