Posted on 07/26/2009 5:35:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
amen!!!
And if this particular clause of the Constitution just isn't important, which one is next? The 1st Amendment? The 14th? Maybe we think those aren't important and then what?
ping for later
That's nuts! Destroying legacy documents does not make sense. I do not believe it any more then I'd believe
Headline?
Constitution scanned onto computer file.
No Need For Constitution In Original Paper Form
"We're going paperless," says U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Nearly all U.S. historical document destroyed
Yesterday someone posted that Andrew Jackson was born elsewhere. (He wasn’t) and it wouldn’t have mattered anyway since he was here before the constitution was ratified. (he fought in the revolution and was even a POW of the british)
Somebody is desperately throwing chaff into the air.
Why aren't the Hawaiian officials being held accountable?
1961 - something happens somewhere that was notable to someone. Fast forward to 2007 - they use a document or record (???) that documented something that happened in 1961 and printed some kind of verification. But, in 2001, all the records were destroyed, so what the HELL was reviewed in 2007 to create the computer-generated document in circulation now? How stooopid do they think we are? /rhetorical
Please, people, let’s move on
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“Let’s move on”....?????
Hm?...Where did I hear this before? Oh! Yes! With Monica Lewinsky and her blue dress.
Well then. Cant these Sotomayor-wanna be explain Executive Order 13489 which Obama signed on his 1st day of office ?
“Sec.2
Notice Of Intent To Disclose Presidential Records
When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines providied by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.”
Now for all of you who commented on our previous articles that we were no more that right-wing nut jobs, that this thing about Obama’s birth certificate was a non-issue, and those of you who tried to shift the focus of the stories, doesn’t this strike you as just a little odd?
http://www.infowars.com/obama-signs-executive-order-barring-release-of-his-birth-certificate/
good post! I’m sick of being called a “crank”. and I’m not willing to give the obamanation a pass on not being eligible to serve in this country. he has already proven how much distain he has for America... this is a great imposter... So far, his body count to hide his lack of being legal is 3. And that’s just the ones we know about. The imposter has blood on his hands
I believe Obama states in his book that he was going through his grandmother’s belongings and he found his birth certificate.
Excerpt-
And just yesterday, Hawaii official changed their story when they told CNN researchers that all original birth certificates had been destroyed in 2001 when the state went paperless. So their claim that they verified’ the information in the COLB against the original in 2008 was a lie. They just made up the information. But if they do still have the original like they claimed last year, then they are now lying about its existence so they don’t have to release it and let the truth come out.”
oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we.......” good catch!
No doctors, nurses or staff remember(have any record) helping deliver the resident of the USA
I'm not at all familiar with what they do in Hawaii, but it can't be all that different from anywhere else when it comes to official documents.
No way could they legally destroy the paper records without making a complete record of their contents. The 'certificate of live birth' doesn't contain all the information that's in an original long form birth certificate (in fact it's a different document). Therefore, it couldn't act as a legal substitute.
Here's where I think they're lying. They DID destroy the paper documents -- but they microfilmed them first. That's what has been done in Georgia. Any birth certificates before WWII have been microfilmed and the paper records destroyed.
The Hawaii authorities are trying to cover for Obama by saying 'the paper records were destroyed' but just happening not to mention that they were all microfilmed first. Betcha money.
“Okay. The bottom line is that, because Hawaii’s records were digitized and then destroyed, there is no paper birth certificate or certificate of live birth (same thing) documenting Mr. Obama’s birth.”
This posting has a serious credibility problem. The official birth certificate was sealed October 2008!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2116426/posts
How could it have been destroyed if it was important enough to be sealedby the state of Hawai?
Someone is trying to make someone look foolish for some reason!
Msot government agencies I am familiar with (state of Cal for 28 years) stored their paper records after digitizing their systems. Why would they destroy the source documents?
Bingo!
” “Let’s move on”....?????
Hm?...Where did I hear this before? Oh! Yes! With Monica Lewinsky and her blue dress.”
Exactly.
The MSM ignored and ridiculed the Monica Lewinsky story.
Just like they did the John Edwards is having an affair.
And John Edwards has a love child.
And JFK had many mistresses.
I’m starting to think it’s about time for Hawaii to be kicked out of the country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.