Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army acquires rights to M4
FederalJack.com ^ | July 7, 2009 | Matthew Cox

Posted on 07/23/2009 11:08:09 AM PDT by re_tail20

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Tarpon

They’re coming up with a new shotgun, too. Something about full-auto and multi-ammo.


21 posted on 07/23/2009 2:59:24 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Full auto 12 ga, I don’t know about that one... A model 12 doesn’t have a disconnector, just pull the trigger, hold and pump, and if you choose you can fire it as fast as you want, but WOW does it hurt. Even as a young whipper-snapper it was brutal.

I would think semi-auto would be enough, if the recoil got softened.

Multi-ammo is an old concept of how you sequence load and intercepting the loading process. But after a while, you just use OO and call it good.


22 posted on 07/23/2009 3:18:18 PM PDT by Tarpon (You relinquish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Perhaps, but government contracts are all about cost.
The prices are FIXED, so any increased cost comes 100% out of profit.

Like I said, you’d better have the right structure to afford those additional costs, especially over smaller, follow-on contracts.

There’s much more to it than just contracting any old AR manufacturer.


23 posted on 07/23/2009 5:11:21 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Bushmaster, Armalite, Magpul, LaRue, ect could fit the bill, and for cheaper than Colt.


24 posted on 07/23/2009 10:16:51 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

“could” fit the bill? Maybe.

They don’t NOW.
That means they’ll have to tool up to meet the MILSPEC requirements.
Some steps and features might be cheap, but other things they don’t do, like MP the barrel and other QC testing, are expensive to set up.

And don’t confuse what you pay for a civvy AR for what the military pays for an M-4 or an M-16.
Not even close.
Colt gets $1200+ for their civvy stuff because people want to pay it.
Don’t confuse that with the true cost.
If Colt is making M-4 carbines for $400 a copy, then the others better be able to, as well.


25 posted on 07/24/2009 5:18:06 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20

Do the military allow ppl to pick their own weapons? If not, they should imho. Give each soldier X amount of $$ and let them buy their own weapons. Then find out which is more popular, then go with that as standard


26 posted on 10/11/2009 12:06:27 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson