Phil Berg a Democrat politico raised this issue during the Democrat primaries for fear that Democrats where going to offer up an ineligible candidate.
That is the genesis of this concern. Any deer can crap in a pond and call all who drink there dirty.
If the crap you call, “Obama Derangement Syndrome” has been dropped into this original concern that does not mean that the concern is invalid.
It just means that you are an abnormal deer because all deers know that one shouldn't crap in fresh water!
Oh, I think that Obama should have revealed his birth certificate before the election, but he didn’t. I thought that should make a “political difference” and cause him to lose the election, but he didn’t. And I see that others want to force Obama to reveal his birth certificate now, but they can’t.
So, I’ve seen that the only course of action is the state laws to force the birth certificate to be shown, by law. Otherwise, there is no legal requirement for any candidate to release their birth certificate.
And in all that, I’ve seen some conservatives “go insane” and that’s the “Obama Derangement Syndrome”. So, I don’t think that opposition to Obama should stop in terms of all his bills and legislation and policies he’s putting through. That’s not the point of knowing what “Obama Derangement Syndrome” is about. All that is about is identifying those who have *crazy ideas* that bear no resemblance to reality.
In the meantime sane people can oppose Obama and also get the birth certificate in ways that will actually work, in real life, instead of descending into “insanity”....
So, yes, the “concern” is valid — and the “Obama Derangement Syndrome” is insanity...
That’s why I also support WorldNetDaily in their consistent flow of articles on the birth certificate issue... :-)