Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

Per Joshua Keating:

“Let’s imagine that Barack Obama had been born in Indonesia or Kenya or anywhere else for that matter, and hadn’t become a citizen until moving to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. Is there one good reason why that would make him less fit to be president?”

This is what I would say to Mr. Keating and any who agree with him:

The constitution of the United States allows amendments to be enacted. If you truly believe that the place of birth for a U.S. President is irrelevant, then you are free to make your case and work with others for an amendment to that end. Although I disagree with you, I fully support your right to work for such an amendment. Until such an amendment is enacted, the constitution stipulates that the President of the United States must be a natural born citizen.


38 posted on 07/22/2009 11:13:26 AM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texan Tory

But they will just respond that the constitution is a “living and breathing document” and our current era make such a requirement “archaic” so who cares what the text says.... their BS is unbelievable


39 posted on 07/22/2009 11:18:16 AM PDT by wrhssaxensemble (Piyush "Bobby" Jindal in 2012 after Obama makes an even bigger mess of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Texan Tory
Or, they can just find a "wise Latina woman" whose richness of experience will sympathize with people who were born elsewhere, and she will nullify the clause in the Constitution when it comes before her.

-PJ

43 posted on 07/22/2009 11:34:07 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (This just in... Voting Republican is a Terrorist act!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson