Ping!
read later
Bookmark. Thanks for posting.
A much better researched and written document as compared to those written by major Cooke’s attorney.
I just want to point out that an acting US Attorney and an ASSistant US Attorney are representing defendants. I thought they were supposed to uphold the Constitution? Our tax dollars at work.
• State v. Hunt, 2 Hill (SC) (1834) – Explains the legal, ethical,, and moral obligation that an officer has to honor his oath to protect and defend the Constitution
• Cole v. Richardson, 405, U.S. 676, 92 S. Ct. 1332, 31 L.Ed.2nd 593 (1972) – explains the military officer’s oath to protect and defend the constitution provides standing
• Bergdoll v. Kane 557 Pa. 72, 731 A.2d 1261, 1268 (1999) – the PA Supreme Court ruled that an attorney had demonstrated a substantial, direct and immediate interest as an attorney sworn to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore had standing to bring suit.
Seems to me that there is legal precedence for the military (such as Major Cook) to legitimately have standing and be able to sue to confirm that their oaths to defend the constitution are upheld and should not face any sort of court martial or disciplinary action in so doing as many Freepers have suggested! Freepers who have suggested this have themselves violated the civil rights of these military officers, such as Major Cook, and owe him an apology!
Secondly Bergdoll v. Kane has already ruled that any attorney seeking to defend and protect the U.S. Constitution HAS STANDING!!!!!!!!! Therefore, ANY suit seeking to protect and defend the Constitution regarding the natural born status of Obama being REJECTED due to lack of standing is FALSE and unconstitutional!
Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Obama’s mother, attended the University of Hawaii during the fall of 1960. She was enrolled at the University of Washington in autumn of 1961.
Between these start dates, Miss Duham became pregnant with Obama on Nov. 1, 1960 while she was 17 years of age. Claims are that she married Obama Sr. on February 2, 1961. If this is correct and Obama Sr. was already married, it would constitute bigamy. Bigamy is outlawed in Hawaii, but legal in Kenya. Thus, chances are that Obama’s mother had moved to Kenya residing there the months preceding Obama’s 1961 birth.
Obama’s own grandmother states that she was present when Obama was born in Kenya. Thus, he would not be a natural born citizen. Obama is reported to have been born August 4, 1961.
Now, how could Obama be born in Kenya or Hawaii and then have his mother enrolled at the University of Washington later that same month? Unlikely movement!
Is there any witnesses to Stanley Ann Dunham’s location and movement in 1961 up through Obama’s birth. Any medical clinic visits in the U.S. during her pregnancy? I have not heard of any which is a good indication that she was in Kenya.
Claims indicate that Obama was adopted and became Barry Soetoro in Indonesia. He would then have lost natural born citizenship if he even ever had it. He attended Occidental College as Barry Soetoro. Occidental College informed Newsweek that Obama enrolled as a foreign student (info at FreeRepublic).
By simply releasing his original long form birth certificate, Obama could prove whether he is a natural born citizen or not. By spending an enormous amount in legal fees to keep his birth certificate hidden, it leads one to think that he is NOT a natural born citizen.