Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: toddausauras
I concur. He has the business and image bona fides to support the ticket. The thing about Palin is that she is the first and last word in charisma. She is so dynamic, has so much star power, that whoever she picks is going to seem like a pallid spectre in comparison. Put any conservative by her side - Mike Pence, Bobby Jindal, Eric Cantor - who could possibly look good next to her? They all now look like schlubs, and I do like them all. So, while I may have disagreements with and doubts about Romney, I would totally support him bringing up the rear on that ticket.


35 posted on 07/20/2009 4:13:19 PM PDT by definitelynotaliberal (Sarah Palin - It's what happens when you attempt to bikini wax a bear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: definitelynotaliberal

And any trained monkey could have done better than Mitt Brutus Romney, who got a "C" rating from CATO.
And that was BEFORE
Romney's Socialized medicine and coverup of the BIGdig kicked in. .
Note that the record also shows that Shapeshifter Romney also betrayed President Bush as Governor
(predicting what TeamROMNEY would do later in Election2008 to Gov. Palin, and every other GOP candidate).
Romney was against the conservative tax cuts.

Here are the facts from CATO.

"As U.S. real output grew 13 percent between 2002 and 2006, Massachusetts trailed at 9 percent.
* Manufacturing employment fell 7 percent nationwide those years, but sank 14 percent under Romney, placing Massachusetts 48th among the states.
* Between fall 2003 and autumn 2006, U.S. job growth averaged 5.4 percent, nearly three times Massachusetts' anemic 1.9 percent pace.
* While 8 million Americans over age 16 found work between 2002 and 2006, the number of employed Massachusetts residents actually declined by 8,500 during those years.
"Massachusetts was the only state to have failed to post any gain in its pool of employed residents," professors Sum and McLaughlin concluded.
In an April 2003 meeting with the Massachusetts congressional delegation in Washington, Romney failed to endorse President Bush's $726 billion tax-cut proposal."

[Cato Institute annual Fiscal Policy Report Card - America's Governors, 2004.]

36 posted on 07/20/2009 4:16:21 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: definitelynotaliberal

It would also be a “peacemaking” gesture seeing as both Sarah and Romney have (at this early stage) the bulk of supporters between them. I just don’t see a huge downside to him being Veep. In the 2008 primaries I often thought “his positions have moved a lot but he IS very credible on the economy and he comes across as a winner”.

Before I get flamed: Palin 2012!


37 posted on 07/20/2009 4:19:37 PM PDT by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson