Replies

When are you people going to realize why the Supremes will not rule on this? When it was brought up before them before, their exact words were “plaintiff does not have standing”. This is because the Constitution only allows the ‘natural born’ determination to be contested by the Electoral College. It’s a Catch 22 situation and a flaw in the Constitution. An Electoral College whose makeup has just been determined to be biased towards the winner is not going to contest his eligibility.

Whetehr or not the USSC rules, it is important to pursue the truth and have the truth made public. The courts will do what they do. If the pressure builds enough there may be a congressional investigation now or in a couple of years. Some how, the truth will become known.

I forgot to sign my reply.

----You people

When are you people going to realize why the Supremes will not rule on this? When it was brought up before them before, their exact words were “plaintiff does not have standing”. This is because the Constitution only allows the ‘natural born’ determination to be contested by the Electoral College. It’s a Catch 22 situation and a flaw in the Constitution. An Electoral College whose makeup has just been determined to be biased towards the winner is not going to contest his eligibility.

Blast it, this standing issue is beginning to torq me off. IMO, At it's most basic, all registered voters who participated in the most recent presidential election would have standing. If they do not would someone (preferably the Chief Justice) explain why they do not have standing. Thanks.

>When are you people going to realize why the Supremes will not rule on this? When it was brought up before them before, their exact words were “plaintiff does not have standing”. This is because the Constitution only allows the ‘natural born’ determination to be contested by the Electoral College. It’s a Catch 22 situation and a flaw in the Constitution. An Electoral College whose makeup has just been determined to be biased towards the winner is not going to contest his eligibility.<

I am not sure i follow your reasoning, but i have always stated that the cases need to be heard in every state individually.
Each state has a sos who verified his eligibility (allegedly)- that verification is what needs to be challenged to take the electoral votes out of the count IMO.

If they did not vet, it is decided in each state that he was not eligible to begin with, the ticket has to be withdrawn.

Only then could the SCOTUS hear the case on appeal after each states appellate court heard it.