[Liberty Ship]

Granted this may have been the Pointe du Hoc of legal efforts, but the guy deserves more than a “hope it was worth it.” I wouldn’t wander around Walter Reed and tell wounded warriors, “hope it was worth it.”

If we have been the victim of a massive fraud in electing Obama, Cooks actions could have exposed it. The risk to him, personally, was and is high. But who can question the value of his actions? I don’t know the truth about Obama, but why all the secrecy in this supposedly transparent administration?

[jwparkerjr]

Those who are not a part of the military, especially in time of war, have no idea what it is or what it stands for, and certainly not the kind of day-to-day effort it takes on the part of a member of the armed forces, and the member's family, to keep America the great military force the world has ever known. And I know of no way to teach them. We'll just have to consider the source of such comments and get back to supporting our troops. Anything that takes away from that vital effort is a waste.

[Non-Sequitur]

If we have been the victim of a massive fraud in electing Obama, Cooks actions could have exposed it.

And how, exactly? What made his case different from all the other cases that have been thrown out because the plaintiff lacked the legal standing to sue? Where was his different? Other servicemen have tried suing and none of them got to square one. Why was Cook different? His reasons for suing were nothing but could be's and might be's, completely theoretical and not a bit concrete. That doesn't meet the legal definition of standing. Cook went down the same path, and his suit would have met the same fate, as all the others. And if Einstein's definition of insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is true, then the whole suit was nuts to begin with.