Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goldman Sachs Predicts 10.5% unemployment rate by 2010 end
Goldman Sachs | July 10, 2009 | reaganaut1

Posted on 07/13/2009 7:02:56 AM PDT by reaganaut1

In the "US Economics Analyst", Goldman Sachs economist Ed McKelvey predicts the unemployment rate, which averaged 9.2% in the 2nd quarter of 2009 (2009Q2), will increase as follows:

2009Q3 9.7
2009Q4 10.0
2010Q1 10.2
2010Q2 10.3
2010Q3 10.4
2010Q4 10.5

I'd be interested to know what informed Freepers project. If these predictions are correct, the 2010 midterms ought to be ugly for the Dems.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 0bamasfault; goldmansachs; obamasfault; thecomingdepression; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: reaganaut1; sickoflibs
Dems are holding off on spending the stimulus money until it will help them politically... count on them spending it just in time to help right before the election. And Goldman? Who knows where they stop and the dems start... Dems don't care about the misery in the country - they care about consolidating power.
21 posted on 07/13/2009 7:27:09 AM PDT by GOPJ (Still waiting for journalists ask Obama how he'll "heal" a deeply divided nation -FreeperOldDeckHand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The real number today is over 16 percent unemployed...

U6


22 posted on 07/13/2009 7:31:03 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The only reason why those numbers might be close is that we’ll get to a point where those unemployed at the beginning of the crash will no longer be counted. And, of course, we don’t count people who are forced into part-time hours with the same company, or who are forced to take paid vacation, or for that matter, people who were self-employed whose businesses have failed.

I look for Michigan to top 18% by the end of this year. This is after 9+ years of recession here, so you know that all of the “fluff” is long since gone.

I might be the worse econ grad that Wabash College ever produced, but I can see the numbers, and I know the theory (even if my calculus stinks). You can’t put trillions of dollars in new (borrowed) fiscal expenditures into the economy, as well as 7+ trillion from the Fed, and not have some effect. That effect will be inflation, and like 1878, the interest rates will have to rise to take that extra money out of the economy.

Therefore, I predict that the economy will worsen for 6 months, then get “better” for 6 months as it gets back to this point. After that, we are likely to see inflation and corresponding high interest rates, and if those happen “quickly” then the economy will slump again in the last quarter of ‘10.


23 posted on 07/13/2009 7:34:58 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Believe the 10.5 will be reached end of 2009, and riots will break out. Many good Americans have already lost so much that nothing will stop the crash of King Obama and many Democrats will fall.
24 posted on 07/13/2009 7:40:52 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wny

The problem with unemployment figures is that they don’t seem to cover those whose unemployment benefits have run out. Thus, isn’t the present unemployment figure actually closer to 12%?


25 posted on 07/13/2009 7:48:12 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

Have sympathy for anyone who loses a job. This is a bad time for that. Went through rough patch when I was 55, not fun.

That said, I hope the tough winter lingers for the folks who brought us this. They fully intend to destroy the U.S. and it is up to us to repel the assault.

Regards,

TF


26 posted on 07/13/2009 7:52:08 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

The SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated "discouraged workers" defined away during the Clinton Administration added to the existing BLS estimates of level U-6 unemployment.
27 posted on 07/13/2009 7:53:45 AM PDT by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

“and like 1878...”

oops... 1978....


28 posted on 07/13/2009 7:56:24 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

Pretty scary data, but I have read their logic and believe it is a pretty accurate assessment of the situation.

There CAN be NO RECOVERY until Obozo is out of office.


29 posted on 07/13/2009 7:57:48 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Petronski predicts 10.5% unemployment rate by 2009 end


30 posted on 07/13/2009 7:58:17 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

We’ll be at 10.5 by the end of the Q1 2010.

Besides, we’re already at over 18% REAL unemployment figured as it was in the 1930’s.


31 posted on 07/13/2009 7:58:46 AM PDT by kingpins10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obama’s plan is working.


32 posted on 07/13/2009 7:59:37 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bertha Fanation

Trophy wife??????? oh my!!!! That is a real stretch, ewwwweeeeeeeweeeeeee.


33 posted on 07/13/2009 7:59:55 AM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

There will be no such unemployment levels at Goldman-Sachs, though. They’ll be going full-bore, working the carbon credit scam.


34 posted on 07/13/2009 8:02:30 AM PDT by Walrus (My congressman is toast in 2010 --- how about yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I don’t know jack, really, but it seems optimistic to me...


35 posted on 07/13/2009 8:03:13 AM PDT by OKSooner (But WAIT!! I'M NOT DONE YET!!! Call now and I'LL TRIPLE THE OFFER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

...”Dems are holding off on spending the stimulus money until it will help them politically”

Exactly. Screw the American people, the liberals have an election coming!


36 posted on 07/13/2009 8:03:33 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; reaganaut1

Exactly!


37 posted on 07/13/2009 8:05:55 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
Those unemployed long enough to no longer be able to draw unemployment benefits simply are dropped from the number.

That is not true. The unemployment rate is not based on the same data as initial jobless claims (which does come from unemployment insurance filings).

38 posted on 07/13/2009 8:10:09 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo

Sound like I am not looking at this correctly.

How do they know when to remove a person from the unemployed list if they no longer qualify for benefits?


39 posted on 07/13/2009 8:12:11 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Melchior
The problem with unemployment figures is that they don’t seem to cover those whose unemployment benefits have run out. Thus, isn’t the present unemployment figure actually closer to 12%?

You have a very good point. I know as many people who are unemployed and beyond their benefits as I do who are unemployed and receiving benefits (circle of friends, relatives and acquaintenances). A lot of those in the first group are working periodically or part time at a minimum wage job, but have not found any work. Not only do they no longer show up in the unemployment figures, but big government's interest in helping them with re-education or in any other capacity simply disappears.

I cannot remember any other time in my life when so many people were unemployed or extremely underemployed.

40 posted on 07/13/2009 8:13:12 AM PDT by Roses0508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson