Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: joeclarke

I agree with what this guy wrote, but he significantly undermines his argument by saying that he acquired a psychiatric conditions partly from the trauma of seeing two people engaged in homosexual activity. That’s something you don’t particularly want to see, but to consider it a traumatic event makes the writer sound strange.


7 posted on 07/12/2009 6:16:32 AM PDT by ottbmare (Ein Reich, ein Volk, ein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ottbmare

“I agree with what this guy wrote, but he significantly undermines his argument by saying that he acquired a psychiatric conditions partly from the trauma of seeing two people engaged in homosexual activity. That’s something you don’t particularly want to see, but to consider it a traumatic event makes the writer sound strange.”

You have to think inside a young man’s combat boots to understand that “men” in the 1960’s were not all that accustomed to seeing man-on-man sexuality in the service in a war zone.

Do you think young soldiers should become totally adjusted to viewing homosexual behavior in the foxhole, or any other holes available?

Call it traumatic or demoralizing, its the same thing.


11 posted on 07/12/2009 8:34:42 AM PDT by joeclarke (qyu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ottbmare

“but to consider it a traumatic event makes the writer sound strange.”

Strange? Section 8 maybe.... The “I am disabled because I saw a couple of queers going at it” is absurd.

Oh! The horrors of war! Sheesh.


12 posted on 07/12/2009 10:35:00 AM PDT by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson