Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TARP for Small Business: Theory Vs. Reality
The Provocateur ^ | 07/11/2009 | Mike Volpe

Posted on 07/11/2009 11:08:25 AM PDT by fiscon1

The government is now floating the idea of giving small businesses money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

The Obama administration is working on a plan that would make available funds from the $700 billion banking-system bailout package to millions of small businesses struggling to survive the recession, FOX News has confirmed.

Gene Sperling, a top adviser to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, developed the idea of using funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to help small businesses as part of a department-wide push to generate ideas to pump life into this ailing part of the economy. The concept is to use TARP funds to increase Small Business Administration loans that are obtained when the government backs 90 percent of a bank loan.

(Excerpt) Read more at theeprovocateur.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: domesticpolicy; obama; smallbusinesses; tarp

1 posted on 07/11/2009 11:08:25 AM PDT by fiscon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

More bad economics.


2 posted on 07/11/2009 11:10:08 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

Once I went to the SBA, asked for help. They said since I wasn´t Hispanic, Black or a woman, there wasn´t any help.


3 posted on 07/11/2009 11:15:39 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

Still a bad move, but if you’re going to drop hundreds of billions to back businesses, it might as well go to the engine of job creation - small business.

Don’t spend the money is the best case; spending it on small business is better than spending on big business.


4 posted on 07/11/2009 11:15:52 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

I think that’s a very political and not economic statement. Big business creates plenty of jobs, but no one wants to be seen as helping big businesses.


5 posted on 07/11/2009 11:18:13 AM PDT by fiscon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

Small business creates more jobs in the USA than big business does. The TARP should have been used to stimulate small business in the first place. Tangentially, efforts should have been made to assist small business to write off health care for its employees.


6 posted on 07/11/2009 11:28:03 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

Next year, TARP for all Americans, We will borrow from the future and spend it all today


7 posted on 07/11/2009 11:30:54 AM PDT by GeronL ( Patriotic Insurrectionist at tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1
This was never what TARP was intended for...Hussein is PISSING all over the law.

Guess it is par for the course for him, he thinks so little of liberty anyway.

8 posted on 07/11/2009 11:35:56 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm SO glad I no longer belong to the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

I think using the money for its INTENDED PURPOSE is what ought to be done. TARP was an idiot idea—it should be REPEALED.

But it should NOT be used for something not written into the law.

The precedence is horrible. Consider: Congress passes a defense budget, but the administration decides to use it for food stamps instead. Completely contrary to what the law was written—this is the problem of Czars, printing money, and centrally controlled economies.

The liberals always griped about the lack of Congressional oversight during Bush’s terms—Hussein has tripled that lack of oversight in less than 6 months, and the liberals and press are SILENT.


9 posted on 07/11/2009 11:38:47 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm SO glad I no longer belong to the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

Government policy shouldn’t be aimed at helping anyone more than anyone else.


10 posted on 07/11/2009 11:46:20 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Melchior
The TARP Tax cuts should have been used to stimulate small all business in the first place.

Tangentially, efforts should have been made to assist business individuals to write off health care for its employees themselves.
11 posted on 07/11/2009 12:00:32 PM PDT by Son House (President Øbama Turns His Back On The Oppressed During Their Darkest Hours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

That graph is graph 15 of the source census data. Job growth is overwhelmingly dominated by small and new businesses, not large businesses. If you want to create jobs, you should fund founding and capitalization of small, new businesses.

12 posted on 07/11/2009 12:03:48 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

JUST CUT TAXES JUST CUT TAXES JUST CUT TAXES


13 posted on 07/11/2009 10:01:04 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson