Replies

Four inconvenient document sources:

1) A 300+ page "manager's amendment" that was added to the bill at 3:09am the day of the House vote. Not only was this a voluminous add-on, it is a scary document. How will local governments be able to afford the extra staff to enforce the new and very confusing building code laws. The bill also radically modifies international trade rules.

http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20090521/hr2454_multi_waxman.pdf

2) A suppressed and censored report from our own EPA exposes many problems with the theories and "consensus" of the populist (and now debunked) theory of global warming, and the true (and minimal) affect of human activity on the climate. The suppressed EPA report is linked here:

http://cei.org/news-release/2009/06/25/cei-releases-global-warming-study-censored-epa

3) A report from the Chicago-based Heartland Institute summarized the Non-Governmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) that attempts to use scientific and rational arguments to identify exactly what is going on in the climate and the true impact of human activity. The recently released NIPCC report is found here:

http://www.sepp.org/publications/NIPCC_final.pdf

4) A deep-in-the-weeds technical website devoted to expose the false data collection and manipulation of research data was used to support al the carbon dioxide and temperature nonsense:

http://www.climateaudit.org/

Thanks for the information. I’ll bookmark them...

One of the problems that I’ve noticed, though, with these kinds of things is that while they are good to have and know for the facts and what is going on, the larger group of people out in the voting public will not be going through this kind of material.

That’s where this kind of documentary comes in handy, because it gets across what a lot of these materials would get across too, but in a fashion that most people are receptive to taking in.

I would advise that where people are interested in these information sources to definitely take them down and read them, but where the larger majority are not going to do that, then make sure that they *at least* see this documentary. It’s the *one thing* (if you only had one item to show someone) that will convince them...