Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/24/2009 8:56:52 PM PDT by Shellybenoit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Shellybenoit

When a cheaper alternative with lower quality is made available, employers will opt to purchase those less costly insurance plans, forcing employees to accept this cheaper alternative which may or may not allow them to keep their current doctors. Employees may also be invited to purchase their own healthcare if they have their heart set on keeping their own physician after years of establishing a trusting doctor-patient relationship. This is the part you’re not told, that ultimately, it will be a luxury to keep your existing physician and your existing health plan.

http://www.thedailychange.com/proponents-of-universal-healthcare-mislead-americans-into-believing-government-funded-does-not-mean-government-run/


2 posted on 06/24/2009 8:59:03 PM PDT by TheDailyChange (Politics,Conservatism,Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Exactly. With the taxpayer picking up the personnel costs for the administration of the government plan, who can compete with that?


3 posted on 06/24/2009 9:01:42 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

Ask Canadians why they come to US for treatment.


4 posted on 06/24/2009 9:10:32 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit

This is a WSJ article, not theLid.. Shouldn’t it be posted as WSJ?


6 posted on 06/24/2009 9:19:34 PM PDT by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson