I don’t know if Obama was born in HI or not. What I am certain of is that he is lying about something. And it may very well be that something could be who his father is.
I would agree completely. It's alleged that one of his lawyers (or staffers?) said that there is information in his original that would "embarrass" him. And true, why hide virtually ALL of his records from birth to college UNLESS there is something there he want's/needs to keep from the public.
That would go towards fraud issues, which itself would be a big deal.
However, being a British and U.S. citizen AT BIRTH, is the question that SCOTUS should ultimately address so that in the future we don't find ourselves with a (for example) Chinese/U.S. dual citizen that the business community and the press is in love with and promotes (a formally repressed ethnic minority) to the sheeple to the point of getting them elected.
How can a NBC of our country, be the subject to another countries law's and jurisdiction (as a minor even)? It's a contradiction. "At Birth" is the point, it's the requirement.
I don’t know if Obama was born in HI or not. What I am certain of is that he is lying about something.
________________
My feelings exactly! But I lean toward he was not born in Hawaii and I am sure the thing posted on the internet is fake. There is something on the original BC they don’t want us to see. The question is....WHAT is he hiding? An embarrassment or something far bigger?